Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37848693›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2024

Impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the management decisions of breast cancer board on early-stage breast cancer.

Abdulselam Özdemir, Mustafa Güven, Serhat Binici, Serhat Uygur, Osman Toktaş

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abdulselam ÖzdemirDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Van Yuzuncu Yıl University, Van, Turkey. mamselam2@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4035-2062
Mustafa GüvenFaculty of Medicine, Van Yuzuncu Yıl University, Van, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7330-9231
Serhat BiniciGeneral Surgery Department, Şırnak State Hospital, Şırnak, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3034-1239
Serhat UygurFaculty of Medicine, Van Yuzuncu Yıl University, Van, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7311-0805
Osman ToktaşDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Van Yuzuncu Yıl University, Van, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1277-1358
Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi · TRŞırnak University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreast cancer is the most common malignancy accounting for 11.7% of all cancer cases, with a rising incidence rate. Various diagnostic methods, including 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT), play a crucial role in breast cancer diagnosis and staging. However, the unnecessary use of advanced imaging techniques such as PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer can have negative effects on both economics and patients. We aimed to investigate the impact of PET/CT on the management decisions of early-stage breast cancer patients by the breast cancer tumor board.

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on a cohort of 81 patients with early-stage breast cancer who were evaluated by breast cancer tumor board from January 2015 to December 2020. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data, along with surgical procedures and treatment options, were documented and analyzed.

resultsThe results showed that 18F-FDG PET/CT had a moderate impact on treatment decisions of breast cancer tumor board, as only treatment decisions were changed in 14,86% of the patients. The surgical procedure decision of breast cancer tumor board changed in 12.35% of patients, while 87.65% of patients had consistent decisions before and after PET/CT. Pathological assessments revealed invasive ductal carcinoma as the most prevalent tumor type, and molecular subtypes were predominantly luminal B. PET/CT use had limited impact on surgical procedures and did not significantly alter treatment decisions of breast cancer tumor board in this early-stage breast cancer cohort.

conclusionsIn conclusion, this study highlights the importance of adherence to the guidelines and appropriate use of PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer management. PET/CT should be reserved for cases where it is clinically warranted, considering the potential economic burden and minimal impact on treatment decisions of breast cancer tumor board in this patient population.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT)Decision-makingEarly-stage breast cancerTumor board

Identifiers

PMID37848693
OpenAlexW4387700827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.