ArticleScientific reports2023
Fine conductive line printing of high viscosity CuO ink using near field electrospinning (NFES).
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modern printed electronics applications require patterning of fine conductive lines of sufficient thickness. However, the two requirements for pattern width and thickness are a trade-off. To print fine pattern at a micrometer size, the nozzle diameter must be approximately the size of the pattern width, so only low-viscosity inks are used. As a result, the pattern is likely to be very thin and multiple overlapping printing is required for sufficient conductance. In order to use high viscosity ink for fine patterning, near field electrospinning (NFES) is attracting attention because it can print very thin and thick patterns using large nozzles (high-viscosity ink). Until now, silver paste ink has been used for microconductive patterning using electrospinning. However, Ag nanoparticle (NP) inks are expensive. In this study, we report the use of a relatively inexpensive CuO NP ink for electrospinning-based printing. For implementation, the material preparation, printing and post-processing process are discussed. For post-processing, a continuous wave (CW) green laser with a 532 nm wavelength was used to reduce the CuO to Cu and sinter the nanoparticles. After sintering, the 50 μm width and 1.48 μm thick Cu conductive line exhibited a resistivity of 5.46 μΩ·cm, which is 3.25 times of the bulk resistivity of Cu.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.