Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37848428›Full record

ArticleNPJ Regenerative medicine2023

Enhanced peripheral nerve regeneration by mechano-electrical stimulation.

Youyi Tai, Thamidul Islam Tonmoy, Shwe Win, Natasha T Brinkley, B Hyle Park, Jin Nam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ Regenerative medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Peripheral nerve repair: innovations and future directions.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Youyi TaiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2530-4225
Thamidul Islam TonmoyDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8430-1104
Shwe WinDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Natasha T BrinkleyDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
B Hyle ParkDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Jin NamDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA. jnam@engr.ucr.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5117-8958
University of California, Riverside · US

Funding

California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) EDUC4-12752NSF | ENG/OAD | Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems (CBET) CBET-1805975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address limitations in current approaches for treating large peripheral nerve defects, the presented study evaluated the feasibility of functional material-mediated physical stimuli on peripheral nerve regeneration. Electrospun piezoelectric poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) nanofibers were utilized to deliver mechanical actuation-activated electrical stimulation to nerve cells/tissues in a non-invasive manner. Using morphologically and piezoelectrically optimized nanofibers for neurite extension and Schwann cell maturation based on in vitro experiments, piezoelectric nerve conduits were synthesized and implanted in a rat sciatic nerve transection model to bridge a critical-sized sciatic nerve defect (15 mm). A therapeutic shockwave system was utilized to periodically activate the piezoelectric effect of the implanted nerve conduit on demand. The piezoelectric nerve conduit-mediated mechano-electrical stimulation (MES) induced enhanced peripheral nerve regeneration, resulting in full axon reconnection with myelin regeneration from the proximal to the distal ends over the critical-sized nerve gap. In comparison, a control group, in which the implanted piezoelectric conduits were not activated in vivo, failed to exhibit such nerve regeneration. In addition, at both proximal and distal ends of the implanted conduits, a decreased number of damaged myelination (ovoids), an increased number of myelinated nerves, and a larger axonal diameter were observed under the MES condition as compared to the control condition. Furthermore, unlike the control group, the MES condition exhibited a superior functional nerve recovery, assessed by walking track analysis and polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography, demonstrating the significant potential of the piezoelectric conduit-based physical stimulation approach for the treatment of peripheral nerve injury.

Identifiers

PMID37848428
PMCPMC10582163
OpenAlexW4387694842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.