Trial reportThe Journal of international medical research2023
Novice residents' endotracheal intubation skill retention on a simulated mannequin after rotating at an anaesthesiology department: a randomized controlled study.
Trial report in The Journal of international medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06842082 (A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Single-blind Study Comparing Direct Laryngoscopy and Videolaryngoscopy for Orotracheal Intubation Performed by Anesthesia Residents in the Operating Room), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Single-blind Study Comparing Direct Laryngoscopy and Videolaryngoscopy for Orotracheal Intubation Performed by Anesthesia Residents in the Operating Room
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- A Comparison of McGrath Mac and HugeMed Video Laryngoscopes in Pediatric Patients Under 3 Years Old-A Prospective Randomized Trial.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the endotracheal intubation skill retention of the McGRATH™ MAC video laryngoscope with that of the Macintosh laryngoscope in first-year residents rotating at an anaesthesiology department.
methodsThis randomized controlled study enrolled first-year residents who completed a 2-month rotation at an anaesthesiology department. Each rotation group was randomly assigned to the Macintosh laryngoscope (ML) or McGRATH™ MAC video laryngoscope (MML) group. Endotracheal intubation skills were evaluated on a mannequin after the rotation and at 3 and 6 months later. The primary endpoint was the time required for intubation. The secondary endpoint was the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score.
resultsForty-six residents participated in this study and were assigned to the ML group (
conclusionCompared with endotracheal intubation training using the Macintosh laryngoscope, the McGRATH™ MAC video laryngoscope shortened the intubation procedure and its effect remained even after 6 months.
trial registrationUMIN-CTR Clinical Trials, UMIN000036643, URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.