Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37848313›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2023

[Effectiveness of proximal femur bionic nail for intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly].

Dongsong Yang, Qiong Wang, Zhonghao Luan, Jiansheng Ling, Peng Chen, Xudong Chen, Dongtao Yuan, Xiangzhou Zhen, Junqiang Wang

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. [Application of precise-guided temporary fixation assistive devices in proximal femoral nail antirotation fixation for femoral intertrochanteric fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dongsong YangDepartment of Orthopedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Luohe Medical College, Luohe Henan, 462300, P. R. China.
Qiong WangDepartment of Orthopedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Luohe Medical College, Luohe Henan, 462300, P. R. China.
Zhonghao LuanDepartment of Information, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Luohe Medical College, Luohe Henan, 462300, P. R. China.
Jiansheng LingDepartment of Orthopedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Luohe Medical College, Luohe Henan, 462300, P. R. China.
Peng ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Luohe Medical College, Luohe Henan, 462300, P. R. China.
Xudong ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Luohe Medical College, Luohe Henan, 462300, P. R. China.
Dongtao YuanDepartment of Orthopedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Luohe Medical College, Luohe Henan, 462300, P. R. China.
Xiangzhou ZhenDepartment of Orthopedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Luohe Medical College, Luohe Henan, 462300, P. R. China.
Junqiang WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Trauma, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate effectiveness of proximal femur bionic nail (PFBN) in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly compared to the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). Methods: A retrospective analysis was made on 48 geriatric patients with intertrochanteric fractures, who met the selection criteria and were admitted between January 2020 and December 2022. Among them, 24 cases were treated with PFBN fixation after fracture reduction (PFBN group), and 24 cases were treated with PFNA fixation (PFNA group). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as age, gender, cause of injury, side and type of fracture, time from injury to operation, and preoperative mobility score, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Alzheimer's disease degree scoring, self-care ability score, osteoporosis degree (T value), and combined medical diseases between the two groups ( Results: The operations in both groups were successfully completed. All patients were followed up 6-15 months with an average time of 9.8 months in PFBN group and 9.6 months in PFNA group. The operation time was significantly longer in PFBN group than in PFNA group ( Conclusion: Compared with PFNA, PFBN in the treatment of elderly intertrochanteric fractures can effectively relieve postoperative pain, shorten bed time, reduce the risk of complications, and facilitate the recovery of patients' hip joint function and walking ability.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHip FracturesAgedBionicsBlood Loss, SurgicalBone NailsFemurHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeinternal fixationIntertrochanteric fractureproximal femoral nail antirotationproximal femur bionic nailthe elderly

Identifiers

PMID37848313
PMCPMC10581878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.