Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37848292›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Clinical use of an emergency manual by resuscitation teams and impact on performance in the emergency department: a prospective mixed-methods study protocol.

Eric Dryver, Pontus Olsson de Capretz, Mohammed Mohammad, Malin Armelin, William D Dupont, Anders Bergenfelz, Ulf Ekelund

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05649891 (Clinical Use of an Emergency Manual by Resuscitation Teams and Impact on Performance in the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05649891 naunknown statusnot on this map

Clinical Use of an Emergency Manual by Resuscitation Teams and Impact on Performance in the Emergency Department

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion SkaneRan2023 to 2024Enrolled2,000ConditionsShortness of Breath, Chest Pain, Abdominal Pain, Altered Mental StatusArmsEmergency Manual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eric DryverDepartment of Emergency and Internal Medicine, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden Eric.dryver@med.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-5750-0079
Pontus Olsson de CapretzDepartment of Emergency and Internal Medicine, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden.
Mohammed MohammadDepartment of Emergency and Internal Medicine, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden.
Malin ArmelinDepartment of Emergency and Internal Medicine, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden.
William D DupontDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Anders BergenfelzDepartment of Clinical Sciences at Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ulf EkelundDepartment of Emergency and Internal Medicine, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSimulation-based studies indicate that crisis checklist use improves management of patients with critical conditions in the emergency department (ED). An interview-based study suggests that use of an emergency manual (EM)-a collection of crisis checklists-improves management of clinical perioperative crises. There is a need for in-depth prospective studies of EM use during clinical practice, evaluating when and how EMs are used and impact on patient management. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This 6-month long study prospectively evaluates a digital EM during management of priority 1 patients in the Skåne University Hospital at Lund's ED. Resuscitation teams are encouraged to use the EM after a management plan has been derived ('Do-Confirm'). The documenting nurse activates and reads from the EM, and checklists are displayed on a large screen visible to all team members. Whether the EM is activated, and which sections are displayed, are automatically recorded. Interventions performed thanks to Do-Confirm EM use are registered by the nurse. Fifty cases featuring such interventions are reviewed by specialists in emergency medicine blinded to whether the interventions were performed prior to or after EM use. All interventions are graded as indicated, of neutral relevance or not indicated. The primary outcome measures are the proportions of interventions performed thanks to Do-Confirm EM use graded as indicated, of neutral relevance, and not indicated. A secondary outcome measure is the team's subjective evaluation of the EM's value on a Likert scale of 1-6. Team members can report events related to EM use, and information from these events is extracted through structured interviews. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Dnr 2022-01896-01). Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and abstracts submitted to national and international conferences to disseminate our findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05649891.

Indexed as

Emergency MedicineEmergency Service, HospitalChecklistHumansProspective StudiesResuscitationaccident & emergency medicineintensive & critical careprotocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID37848292
PMCPMC10583077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.