Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37848289›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2023

A Somatosensory Computation That Unifies Limbs and Tools.

Luke E Miller, Cécile Fabio, Frédérique de Vignemont, Alice Roy, W Pieter Medendorp, Alessandro Farnè

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Luke E MillerIntegrative Multisensory Perception Action and Cognition Team-ImpAct, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 1028, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité 5292, 69500 Bron, France luke.miller@donders.ru.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-7865-881X
Cécile FabioIntegrative Multisensory Perception Action and Cognition Team-ImpAct, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 1028, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité 5292, 69500 Bron, France.
Frédérique de VignemontInstitut Jean Nicod, Department of Cognitive Studies, Ecole Normale Superieure, Paris Sciences et Lettres University, 75005 Paris, France.
Alice RoyLaboratoire Dynamique du Langage, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5596, 69007 Lyon, France.
W Pieter MedendorpDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6525 GD, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9615-4220
Alessandro FarnèIntegrative Multisensory Perception Action and Cognition Team-ImpAct, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 1028, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité 5292, 69500 Bron, France.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRLaboratoire Dynamique du Langage · FRRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversité Paris Sciences et Lettres · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is often claimed that tools are embodied by their user, but whether the brain actually repurposes its body-based computations to perform similar tasks with tools is not known. A fundamental computation for localizing touch on the body is trilateration. Here, the location of touch on a limb is computed by integrating estimates of the distance between sensory input and its boundaries (e.g., elbow and wrist of the forearm). As evidence of this computational mechanism, tactile localization on a limb is most precise near its boundaries and lowest in the middle. Here, we show that the brain repurposes trilateration to localize touch on a tool, despite large differences in initial sensory input compared with touch on the body. In a large sample of participants, we found that localizing touch on a tool produced the signature of trilateration, with highest precision close to the base and tip of the tool. A computational model of trilateration provided a good fit to the observed localization behavior. To further demonstrate the computational plausibility of repurposing trilateration, we implemented it in a three-layer neural network that was based on principles of probabilistic population coding. This network determined hit location in tool-centered coordinates by using a tool's unique pattern of vibrations when contacting an object. Simulations demonstrated the expected signature of trilateration, in line with the behavioral patterns. Our results have important implications for how trilateration may be implemented by somatosensory neural populations. We conclude that trilateration is likely a fundamental spatial computation that unifies limbs and tools.

Indexed as

TouchTouch PerceptionBrainHandHumansWristcomputationembodimentspacetactile localizationtool use

Identifiers

PMID37848289
PMCPMC10668222
OpenAlexW4387700734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.