Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37848269›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2023

The cost of public health interventions to respond to the 10th Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Wu Zeng, Hadia Samaha, Michel Yao, Steve Ahuka-Mundeke, Thomas Wilkinson, Thibaut Jombart, Dominique Baabo, Jean-Pierre Lokonga, Sylvain Yuma, Linda Mobula-Shufelt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Wu ZengDepartment of Global Health, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA wz192@georgetown.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3473-3638
Hadia SamahaWorld Bank Group, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Michel YaoWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Steve Ahuka-MundekeNational Institute for Biomedical Research, Kinshasa, Congo (the Democratic Republic of the).
Thomas WilkinsonWorld Bank Group, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Thibaut JombartMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Dominique BaaboProject Implementation Unit of World Bank Health Projects, Ministry of Public Health, Hygiene and Prevention, Kinshasa, Congo (the Democratic Republic of the).
Jean-Pierre LokongaProject Implementation Unit of World Bank Health Projects, Ministry of Public Health, Hygiene and Prevention, Kinshasa, Congo (the Democratic Republic of the).
Sylvain YumaMinistry of Public Health, Hygiene and Prevention, Kinshasa, Congo (the Democratic Republic of the).
Linda Mobula-ShufeltWorld Bank Group, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Ministry of Public Health · CDWorld Bank Group · USGeorgetown University · USImperial College London · GBNational Institute of Biomedical Research · CDWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/X020258/1World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 10th Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) drew substantial attention from the international community, which in turn invested more than US$1 billion in EVD control over two years (2018-2020). This is the first EVD outbreak to take place in a conflict area, which led to a shift in strategy from a pure public health response (PHR) to a multisectoral humanitarian response. A wide range of disease control and mitigation activities were implemented and were outlined in the five budgeted Strategic Response Plans used throughout the 26 months. This study used the budget/expenditure and output indicators for disease control and mitigation interventions compiled by the government of DRC and development and humanitarian partners to estimate unit costs of key Ebola control interventions. Of all the investment in EVD control, 68% was spent on PHR. The remaining 32% covered security, community support interventions for the PHR. The disbursement for the public health pillar was distributed as follows: (1) coordination (18.8%), (2), clinical management of EVD cases (18.4%), (3) surveillance and vaccination (15.9%), (4) infection prevention and control/WASH (13.8%) and (5) risk communication (13.7%). The unit costs of key EVD control interventions were as follows: US$66 182 for maintaining a rapid response team per month, US$4435 for contact tracing and surveillance per identified EVD case, US$1464 for EVD treatment per case, US$59.4 per EVD laboratory test, US$120.7 per vaccinated individual against EVD and US$175.0 for mental health and psychosocial support per beneficiary. The estimated unit costs of key EVD disease control interventions provide crucial information for future infectious disease control planning and budgeting, as well as prioritisation of disease control interventions.

Indexed as

Hemorrhagic Fever, EbolaCommunicationDemocratic Republic of the CongoDisease OutbreaksHumansPublic HealthHealth economicsHealth policy

Identifiers

PMID37848269
PMCPMC10583089
OpenAlexW4387709469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.