Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37848179›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2024

A case study on variations in network structure and cross-sector alignment in two local systems serving pregnant and parenting women in recovery.

Liza M Creel, Yana B Feygin, Madeline Shipley, Deborah W Davis, Tiffany Cole Hall, Chaly Downs, Stephanie Hoskins, Natalie Pasquenza, Scott D Duncan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Liza M CreelDivision of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1222-678X
Yana B FeyginNorton Children's Research Institute affiliated with the University of Louisville School of Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3192-5677
Madeline ShipleyScientific and Health Policy Initiatives, ISPOR - The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Lawrenceville, New Jersey, USA.
Deborah W DavisNorton Children's Research Institute affiliated with the University of Louisville School of Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5943-3877
Tiffany Cole HallThe Morton Center, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Chaly DownsAddition Recovery Services, Volunteers of America, Mid-States, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Stephanie HoskinsAddition Recovery Services, Volunteers of America, Mid-States, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Natalie PasquenzaExternal Relations, Volunteers of America, Mid-States, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Scott D DuncanDivision of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Health Volunteers Overseas · USUniversity of Louisville · USThe Morton Center · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation 77407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe network structure and alignment across organizations in healthcare, public health, and social services sectors that serve pregnant and parenting women with substance use disorder (SUD) in an urban and a rural community. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTINGS: Two community networks, one urban and one rural with each including a residential substance use treatment program, in Kentucky during 2021. STUDY

designSocial network analysis measured system collaboration and cross-sector alignment between healthcare, public health, and social services organizations, applying the Framework for Aligning Sectors. To understand the alignment and structure of each network, we measured network density overall and between sectors, network centralization, and each organization's degree centrality and effective size. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsComputer-assisted telephone interviews were conducted to document alignment around shared purpose, data, financing, and governance. PRINCIPAL

findingsOn average, overall and cross-sector network densities in both communities were similar. However, alignment was highest for data sharing and financing in the urban community and for shared purpose and governance in the rural community. Cross-sector partnerships involving healthcare organizations were more prevalent in the rural county (44% vs. 38% for healthcare/public health, 44% vs. 29% for healthcare/social services), but more prevalent for those involving public health/social services organizations in the urban county (42% vs. 24%). A single healthcare organization had the highest degree centrality (Mdn [IQR] = 26 [26-9.5]) and effective size (Mdn [IQR] = 15.9 [20.6-8.7]) within the rural county. Social services organizations held more central positions in the urban county (degree centrality Mdn [IQR] = 13 [14.8-9.5]; effective size Mdn [IQR] = 10.4 [11.4-7.9]).

conclusionsCross-sector alignment may strengthen local capacity for comprehensive SUD care for pregnant and parenting women. Healthcare organizations are key players in cross-sector partnerships in the rural community, where one healthcare facility holds the central brokerage role. In contrast, public health agencies are key to cross-sector collaboration with social services in the urban community.

Indexed as

ParentingSocial WorkCommunity NetworksDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansPregnancyPublic Healthchild and adolescent healthhealth care organizations and systemsintegrated delivery systemsmaternal and perinatal care and outcomesrural healthsocial determinants of healthsubstance use: alcohol/chemical dependency/tobacco

Identifiers

PMID37848179
PMCPMC10796293
OpenAlexW4387697943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.