Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37848061›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2023

Reinforcement-based processes actively regulate motor exploration along redundant solution manifolds.

Adam M Roth, Jan A Calalo, Rakshith Lokesh, Seth R Sullivan, Stephen Grill, John J Jeka, Katinka van der Kooij, Michael J Carter, Joshua G A Cashaback

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Online Movements Reflect Ongoing Deliberation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adam M RothDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-2890-6312
Jan A CalaloDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Rakshith LokeshDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Seth R SullivanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Stephen GrillKinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
John J JekaKinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Katinka van der KooijFaculty of Behavioural and Movement Science, Vrije University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081HV, The Netherlands.
Michael J CarterDepartment of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Room 203, Ivor Wynne Centre, Hamilton, L8S 4L8, Ontario, Canada.
Joshua G A CashabackDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.

Funding

Subproject Title: Clinical Research Education, Mentoring and Career Development CoreU54GM104941 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI Megan M Wenner · 2013 to 2026
$60.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From a baby's babbling to a songbird practising a new tune, exploration is critical to motor learning. A hallmark of exploration is the emergence of random walk behaviour along solution manifolds, where successive motor actions are not independent but rather become serially dependent. Such exploratory random walk behaviour is ubiquitous across species' neural firing, gait patterns and reaching behaviour. The past work has suggested that exploratory random walk behaviour arises from an accumulation of movement variability and a lack of error-based corrections. Here, we test a fundamentally different idea-that reinforcement-based processes regulate random walk behaviour to promote continual motor exploration to maximize success. Across three human reaching experiments, we manipulated the size of both the visually displayed target and an unseen reward zone, as well as the probability of reinforcement feedback. Our empirical and modelling results parsimoniously support the notion that exploratory random walk behaviour emerges by utilizing knowledge of movement variability to update intended reach aim towards recently reinforced motor actions. This mechanism leads to active and continuous exploration of the solution manifold, currently thought by prominent theories to arise passively. The ability to continually explore muscle, joint and task redundant solution manifolds is beneficial while acting in uncertain environments, during motor development or when recovering from a neurological disorder to discover and learn new motor actions.

Indexed as

LearningReinforcement, PsychologyFeedbackHumansMovementPsychomotor PerformanceRewardexplorationlearningredundantreinforcementsensorimotor

Identifiers

PMID37848061
PMCPMC10581769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.