Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37848023›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection2023

Mathematical solutions in internal dose assessment: A comparison of Python-based differential equation solvers in biokinetic modeling.

Emmanuel Matey Mate-Kole, Dmitri Margot, Shaheen Azim Dewji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Machine learning-enhanced stochastic uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the ICRP human respiratory tract model for an inhaled radionuclide.Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection · 2024
    Article
  5. Mathematical complexities in radionuclide metabolic modelling: a review of ordinary differential equation kinetics solvers in biokinetic modelling.Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emmanuel Matey Mate-KoleNuclear and Radiological Engineering and Medical Physics Programs, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4311-6559
Dmitri MargotNuclear and Radiological Engineering and Medical Physics Programs, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2728-9871
Shaheen Azim DewjiNuclear and Radiological Engineering and Medical Physics Programs, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3699-5877

Funding

Project 4: Post-Exposure Biomarkers and Remediation of Radionuclide ContaminantsP01AI165380 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GAYLE E. WOLOSCHAK · 2022 to 2026
$12.9M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI165380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In biokinetic modeling systems employed for radiation protection, biological retention and excretion have been modeled as a series of discretized compartments representing the organs and tissues of the human body. Fractional retention and excretion in these organ and tissue systems have been mathematically governed by a series of coupled first-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs). The coupled ODE systems comprising the biokinetic models are usually stiff due to the severe difference between rapid and slow transfers between compartments. In this study, the capabilities of solving a complex coupled system of ODEs for biokinetic modeling were evaluated by comparing different Python programming language solvers and solving methods with the motivation of establishing a framework that enables multi-level analysis. The stability of the solvers was analyzed to select the best performers for solving the biokinetic problems. A Python-based linear algebraic method was also explored to examine how the numerical methods deviated from an analytical or semi-analytical method. Results demonstrated that customized implicit methods resulted in an enhanced stable solution for the inhaled

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalRadiation ProtectionHumansbiokinetic modelingcompartmental analysisinternal dosimetryODE solversPython

Identifiers

PMID37848023
PMCPMC10613827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.