Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37847776›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

Automated calibration of consensus weighted distance-based clustering approaches using sharp.

Barbara Bodinier, Dragana Vuckovic, Sabrina Rodrigues, Sarah Filippi, Julien Chiquet, Marc Chadeau-Hyam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Barbara BodinierDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London, Norfolk place, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0781-3624
Dragana VuckovicDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London, Norfolk place, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom.
Sabrina RodriguesDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London, Norfolk place, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom.
Sarah FilippiDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London SW7 2RH, United Kingdom.
Julien ChiquetUMR MIA Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech/INRAE, Palaiseau 91123, France.
Marc Chadeau-HyamDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London, Norfolk place, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8341-5436

Funding

Cancer Research UK 22184Medical Research Council MR/S019669/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationIn consensus clustering, a clustering algorithm is used in combination with a subsampling procedure to detect stable clusters. Previous studies on both simulated and real data suggest that consensus clustering outperforms native algorithms.

resultsWe extend here consensus clustering to allow for attribute weighting in the calculation of pairwise distances using existing regularized approaches. We propose a procedure for the calibration of the number of clusters (and regularization parameter) by maximizing the sharp score, a novel stability score calculated directly from consensus clustering outputs, making it extremely computationally competitive. Our simulation study shows better clustering performances of (i) approaches calibrated by maximizing the sharp score compared to existing calibration scores and (ii) weighted compared to unweighted approaches in the presence of features that do not contribute to cluster definition. Application on real gene expression data measured in lung tissue reveals clear clusters corresponding to different lung cancer subtypes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The R package sharp (version ≥1.4.3) is available on CRAN at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sharp.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCalibrationCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationConsensus

Identifiers

PMID37847776
PMCPMC10627366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.