Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37847686›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

MEG correlates of speech planning in simple vs. interactive picture naming in children and adults.

Ebony Goldman, Sherine Bou-Dargham, Marco Lai, Anvita Guda, Jacqui Fallon, Miriam Hauptman, Alejandra Reinoso, Sarah Phillips, Ellie Abrams, Alicia Parrish and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ebony GoldmanDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Sherine Bou-DarghamNYUAD Research Institute, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Marco LaiDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Anvita GudaDepartment of Linguistics, New York University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Jacqui FallonDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Miriam HauptmanDepartment of Psychology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Alejandra ReinosoDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States of America.
Sarah PhillipsDepartment of Linguistics, New York University, New York, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4588-583X
Ellie AbramsDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2130-8891
Alicia ParrishDepartment of Linguistics, New York University, New York, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1054-0516
Liina PylkkänenDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6332-9378
New York University · USNew York University Abu Dhabi · AEGeorgetown University · USJohns Hopkins University · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The picture naming task is common both as a clinical task and as a method to study the neural bases of speech production in the healthy brain. However, this task is not reflective of most naturally occurring productions, which tend to happen within a context, typically in dialogue in response to someone else's production. How the brain basis of the classic "confrontation picture naming" task compares to the planning of utterances in dialogue is not known. Here we used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to measure neural activity associated with language production using the classic picture naming task as well as a minimal variant of the task, intended as more interactive or dialogue-like. We assessed how neural activity is affected by the interactive context in children, teenagers, and adults. The general pattern was that in adults, the interactive task elicited a robust sustained increase of activity in frontal and temporal cortices bilaterally, as compared to simple picture naming. This increase was present only in the left hemisphere in teenagers and was absent in children, who, in fact, showed the reverse effect. Thus our findings suggest a robustly bilateral neural basis for the coordination of interaction and a very slow developmental timeline for this network.

Indexed as

MagnetoencephalographySpeechAdolescentAdultBrainBrain MappingChildHumansLanguage

Identifiers

PMID37847686
PMCPMC10581494
OpenAlexW4387701077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.