Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37847669›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2023

Pivotal trial of a deep-learning-based retinal biomarker (Reti-CVD) in the prediction of cardiovascular disease: data from CMERC-HI.

Chan Joo Lee, Tyler Hyungtaek Rim, Hyun Goo Kang, Joseph Keunhong Yi, Geunyoung Lee, Marco Yu, Soo-Hyun Park, Jin-Taek Hwang, Yih-Chung Tham, Tien Yin Wong and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Chan Joo LeeDivision of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8756-409X
Tyler Hyungtaek RimOcular Epidemiology Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-6465-2620
Hyun Goo KangDivision of Retina, Severance Eye Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, South Korea.
Joseph Keunhong YiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Geunyoung LeeMediwhale Inc, Seoul 08378, South Korea.
Marco YuOcular Epidemiology Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2825-8914
Soo-Hyun ParkFood Functionality Research Division, Korea Food Research Institute, Wanju 55365, South Korea.
Jin-Taek HwangFood Functionality Research Division, Korea Food Research Institute, Wanju 55365, South Korea.
Yih-Chung ThamOcular Epidemiology Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore.
Tien Yin WongOcular Epidemiology Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8448-1264
Ching-Yu ChengOcular Epidemiology Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-0655-885X
Dong Wook KimDepartment of Information and Statistics, Department of Bio & Medical Big Data, Research Institution of National Science (RINS), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, South Korea.
Sung Soo KimDivision of Retina, Severance Eye Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, South Korea.
Sungha ParkDivision of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5362-478X
Yonsei University · KRSingapore National Eye Center · SGNational University of Singapore · SGGyeongsang National University · KRKorea Food Research Institute · KRThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency 2021-ER0903-02Korea Food Research InstituteKorea Health Industry Development InstituteKorean Health Technology Research and DevelopmentKorean Health Technology Research and Development Project via Korea Health Industry Development InstituteKorean Ministry of Science and ICTMain Research Program E0210601-03Ministry of Health and Welfare HI13C0715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe potential of using retinal images as a biomarker of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk has gained significant attention, but regulatory approval of such artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms is lacking. In this regulated pivotal trial, we validated the efficacy of Reti-CVD, an AI-Software as a Medical Device (AI-SaMD), that utilizes retinal images to stratify CVD risk. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective study, we used data from the Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases Etiology Research Center-High Risk (CMERC-HI) Cohort. Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate hazard ratio (HR) trend across the 3-tier CVD risk groups (low-, moderate-, and high-risk) according to Reti-CVD in prediction of CVD events. The cardiac computed tomography-measured coronary artery calcium (CAC), carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) were compared to Reti-CVD.

resultsA total of 1106 participants were included, with 33 (3.0%) participants experiencing CVD events over 5 years; the Reti-CVD-defined risk groups (low, moderate, and high) were significantly associated with increased CVD risk (HR trend, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.26-3.24). When all variables of Reti-CVD, CAC, CIMT, baPWV, and other traditional risk factors were incorporated into one Cox model, the Reti-CVD risk groups were only significantly associated with increased CVD risk (HR = 2.40 [0.82-7.03] in moderate risk and HR = 3.56 [1.34-9.51] in high risk using low-risk as a reference). DISCUSSION: This regulated pivotal study validated an AI-SaMD, retinal image-based, personalized CVD risk scoring system (Reti-CVD).

conclusionThese results led the Korean regulatory body to authorize Reti-CVD.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCoronary Artery DiseaseDeep LearningAnkle Brachial IndexArtificial IntelligenceBiomarkersCarotid Intima-Media ThicknessHumansPulse Wave AnalysisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsBiomarkerscardiovascular diseasedeep learningregulated pivotal studyReti-CVDretinal photographsoftware as a medical device (SaMD)

Identifiers

PMID37847669
PMCPMC10746299
OpenAlexW4387701123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.