Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37847664›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2023

Information displays for automated surveillance algorithms of in-hospital patient deterioration: a scoping review.

Yik-Ki Jacob Wan, Melanie C Wright, Mary M McFarland, Deniz Dishman, Mary A Nies, Adriana Rush, Karl Madaras-Kelly, Amanda Jeppesen, Guilherme Del Fiol

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yik-Ki Jacob WanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9767-2046
Melanie C WrightCollege of Pharmacy, Idaho State University, Meridian, ID 83642, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7121-504X
Mary M McFarlandEccles Health Sciences Library, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States.
Deniz DishmanCizik School of Nursing Department of Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Mary A NiesCollege of Health, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, United States.
Adriana RushDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States.
Karl Madaras-KellyCollege of Pharmacy, Idaho State University, Meridian, ID 83642, United States.
Amanda JeppesenCollege of Pharmacy, Idaho State University, Meridian, ID 83642, United States.
Guilherme Del FiolDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9954-6799

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
Timely Response to In-Hospital Deterioration Through Design of Actionable Augmented IntelligenceR01GM137083 · NIGMS · IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BUTLER, JORIE MICHAELA, DEL FIOL, GUILHERME · 2020 to 2023
$1.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR002538NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM137083NIH HHS UL1TR002538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSurveillance algorithms that predict patient decompensation are increasingly integrated with clinical workflows to help identify patients at risk of in-hospital deterioration. This scoping review aimed to identify the design features of the information displays, the types of algorithm that drive the display, and the effect of these displays on process and patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe scoping review followed Arksey and O'Malley's framework. Five databases were searched with dates between January 1, 2009 and January 26, 2022. Inclusion criteria were: participants-clinicians in inpatient settings; concepts-intervention as deterioration information displays that leveraged automated AI algorithms; comparison as usual care or alternative displays; outcomes as clinical, workflow process, and usability outcomes; and context as simulated or real-world in-hospital settings in any country. Screening, full-text review, and data extraction were reviewed independently by 2 researchers in each step. Display categories were identified inductively through consensus.

resultsOf 14 575 articles, 64 were included in the review, describing 61 unique displays. Forty-one displays were designed for specific deteriorations (eg, sepsis), 24 provided simple alerts (ie, text-based prompts without relevant patient data), 48 leveraged well-accepted score-based algorithms, and 47 included nurses as the target users. Only 1 out of the 10 randomized controlled trials reported a significant effect on the primary outcome.

conclusionsDespite significant advancements in surveillance algorithms, most information displays continue to leverage well-understood, well-accepted score-based algorithms. Users' trust, algorithmic transparency, and workflow integration are significant hurdles to adopting new algorithms into effective decision support tools.

Indexed as

InpatientsSepsisAlgorithmsData DisplayHospitalsHumansclinical decision supportinformation displaymachine learningpatient deterioration

Identifiers

PMID37847664
PMCPMC10746326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.