ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
Determining epitope specificity of T-cell receptors with transformers.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of biologically relevant negative samples on machine learning-based B-cell epitope prediction for Influenza A.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
summaryT-cell receptors (TCRs) on T cells recognize and bind to epitopes presented by the major histocompatibility complex in case of an infection or cancer. However, the high diversity of TCRs, as well as their unique and complex binding mechanisms underlying epitope recognition, make it difficult to predict the binding between TCRs and epitopes. Here, we present the utility of transformers, a deep learning strategy that incorporates an attention mechanism that learns the informative features, and show that these models pre-trained on a large set of protein sequences outperform current strategies. We compared three pre-trained auto-encoder transformer models (ProtBERT, ProtAlbert, and ProtElectra) and one pre-trained auto-regressive transformer model (ProtXLNet) to predict the binding specificity of TCRs to 25 epitopes from the VDJdb database (human and murine). Two additional modifications were performed to incorporate gene usage of the TCRs in the four transformer models. Of all 12 transformer implementations (four models with three different modifications), a modified version of the ProtXLNet model could predict TCR-epitope pairs with the highest accuracy (weighted F1 score 0.55 simultaneously considering all 25 epitopes). The modification included additional features representing the gene names for the TCRs. We also showed that the basic implementation of transformers outperformed the previously available methods, i.e. TCRGP, TCRdist, and DeepTCR, developed for the same biological problem, especially for the hard-to-classify labels. We show that the proficiency of transformers in attention learning can be made operational in a complex biological setting like TCR binding prediction. Further ingenuity in utilizing the full potential of transformers, either through attention head visualization or introducing additional features, can extend T-cell research avenues. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Data and code are available on https://github.com/InduKhatri/tcrformer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.