Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37847528›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of cell biology2023

Successful 3D imaging of cleared biological samples with light sheet fluorescence microscopy.

Elise Delage, Thomas Guilbert, Frank Yates

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of cell biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elise DelageCellTechs Laboratory, SupBiotech, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1217-6225
Thomas GuilbertInstitut Cochin, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (U1016), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (UMR 8104), Université de Paris (UMR-S1016) , Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5069-0730
Frank YatesCellTechs Laboratory, SupBiotech, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3590-5745
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In parallel with the development of tissue-clearing methods, over the last decade, light sheet fluorescence microscopy has contributed to major advances in various fields, such as cell and developmental biology and neuroscience. While biologists are increasingly integrating three-dimensional imaging into their research projects, their experience with the technique is not always up to their expectations. In response to a survey of specific challenges associated with sample clearing and labeling, image acquisition, and data analysis, we have critically assessed the recent literature to characterize the difficulties inherent to light sheet fluorescence microscopy applied to cleared biological samples and to propose solutions to overcome them. This review aims to provide biologists interested in light sheet fluorescence microscopy with a primer for the development of their imaging pipeline, from sample preparation to image analysis. Importantly, we believe that issues could be avoided with better anticipation of image analysis requirements, which should be kept in mind while optimizing sample preparation and acquisition parameters.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMicroscopy, Fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID37847528
PMCPMC10583220
OpenAlexW4387692081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.