Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37847503›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Long-Term Outcomes and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms.

Jaime de la Fuente, Arjun Chatterjee, Jacob Lui, Avinash K Nehra, Matthew G Bell, Ryan J Lennon, Blake A Kassmeyer, Rondell P Graham, Hiroki Nagayama, Phillip J Schulte and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jaime de la FuenteDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Arjun ChatterjeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Jacob LuiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and the Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Avinash K NehraDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Matthew G BellDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Ryan J LennonDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Blake A KassmeyerDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Rondell P GrahamDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Hiroki NagayamaDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Phillip J SchulteDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Karen A DoeringDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Adriana M DelgadoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Santhi Swaroop VegeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Suresh T ChariDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Texas MD Anderson, Houston.
Naoki TakahashiDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Shounak MajumderDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USWinnMed · USCleveland Clinic · USColumbia University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS UL1 Supplement - Dr. Timothy Curry)UL1TR002377 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VESNA D GAROVIC · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
Mayo Clinic Prospective Resource for Biomarker Validation and Early Detection of Pancreatic CancerU01CA210138 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Shounak Majumder, Kenneth Zaret · 2016 to 2026
$9.0M
Interdisciplinary Infrastructure for Aging Research: Rochester Epidemiology ProjectR33AG058738 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LEBRASSEUR, NATHAN K, OLSON, JANET E · 2020 to 2022
$2.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002377NCI NIH HHS U01 CA210138NIA NIH HHS R33 AG058738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are pancreatic cysts that can give rise to pancreatic cancer (PC). Limited population data exist on their prevalence, natural history, or risk of malignant transformation (IPMN-PC). Objective: To fill knowledge gaps in epidemiology of IPMNs and associated PC risk by estimating population prevalence of IPMNs, associated PC risk, and proportion of IPMN-PC. Design, Setting, and Participants: : This retrospective cohort study was conducted in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Using the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP), patients aged 50 years and older with abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans between 2000 and 2015 were randomly selected (CT cohort). All patients from the REP with PC between 2000 and 2019 were also selected (PC cohort). Data were analyzed from November 2021 through August 2023. Main outcomes and Measures: CIs for PC incidence estimates were calculated using exact methods with the Poisson distribution. Cox models were used to estimate age, sex, and stage-adjusted hazard ratios for time-to-event end points. Results: The CT cohort included 2114 patients (1140 females [53.9%]; mean [SD] age, 68.6 [12.1] years). IPMNs were identified in 231 patients (10.9%; 95% CI, 9.7%-12.3%), most of which were branch duct (210 branch-duct [90.9%], 16 main-duct [6.9%], and 5 mixed [2.2%] IPMNs). There were 5 Fukuoka high-risk (F-HR) IPMNs (2.2%), 39 worrisome (F-W) IPMNs (16.9%), and 187 negative (F-N) IPMNs (81.0%). After a median (IQR) follow-up of 12.0 (8.1-15.3) years, 4 patients developed PC (2 patients in F-HR and 2 patients in F-N groups). The PC incidence rate per 100 person years for F-HR IPMNs was 34.06 incidents (95% CI, 4.12-123.02 incidents) and not significantly different for patients with F-N IPMNs compared with patients without IPMNs (0.16 patients; 95% CI, 0.02-0.57 patients vs 0.11 patients; 95% CI, 0.06-0.17 patients; P = .62). The PC cohort included 320 patients (155 females [48.4%]; mean [SD] age, 72.0 [12.3] years), and 9.8% (95% CI, 7.0%-13.7%) had IPMN-PC. Compared with 284 patients with non-IPMN PC, 31 patients with IPMN-PC were older (mean [SD] age, 76.9 [9.2] vs 71.3 [12.5] years; P = .02) and more likely to undergo surgical resection (14 patients [45.2%] vs 60 patients [21.1%]; P = .003) and more-frequently had nonmetastatic PC at diagnosis (20 patients [64.5%] vs 130 patients [46.8%]; P = .047). Patients with IPMN-PC had better survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40-0.94; P = .03) than patients with non-IPMN PC. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, CTs identified IPMNs in approximately 10% of patients aged 50 years or older. PC risk in patients with F-N IPMNs was low and not different compared with patients without IPMNs; approximately 10% of patients with PC had IPMN-PC, and they had better survival compared with patients with non-IPMN PC.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and SerousPancreatic Intraductal NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37847503
PMCPMC10582793
OpenAlexW4387692379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.