Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37847469›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2023

A Spatiotemporal and Multisensory Approach to Designing Wearable Clinical ICU Alarms.

Ayush Sangari, Molly A Bingham, Mabel Cummins, Aditya Sood, Anqy Tong, Palmer Purcell, Joseph J Schlesinger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ayush SangariRenaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, 100 Nicolls Rd, Stony Brook, NY, 11790, USA. ayush.sangari@stonybrookmedicine.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2379-9316
Molly A BinghamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0486-0182
Mabel CumminsDepartment of Neuroscience, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3875-4759
Aditya SoodLong Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6900-5473
Anqy TongDepartment of Neuroscience, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Palmer PurcellThe New School, New York City, NY, USA.
Joseph J SchlesingerDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3978-2647
Vanderbilt University · USLong Island Jewish Medical Center · USNew School · USStony Brook School · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Office of Naval Research Grant N00014-22-1-2184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In health care, auditory alarms are an important aspect of an informatics system that monitors patients and alerts clinicians attending to multiple concurrent tasks. However, the volume, design, and pervasiveness of existing Intensive Care Unit (ICU) alarms can make it difficult to quickly distinguish their meaning and importance. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of two design approaches not yet explored in a smartwatch-based alarm system designed for ICU use: (1) using audiovisual spatial colocalization and (2) adding haptic (i.e., touch) information. We compared the performance of 30 study participants using ICU smartwatch alarms containing auditory icons in two implementations of the audio modality: colocalized with the visual cue on the smartwatch's low-quality speaker versus delivered from a higher quality speaker located two feet away from participants (like a stationary alarm bay situated near patients in the ICU). Additionally, we compared participant performance using alarms with two sensory modalities (visual and audio) against alarms with three sensory modalities (adding haptic cues). Participants were 10.1% (0.24s) faster at responding to alarms when auditory information was delivered from the smartwatch instead of the higher quality external speaker. Meanwhile, adding haptic information to alarms improved response times to alarms by 12.2% (0.23s) and response times on their primary task by 10.3% (0.08s). Participants rated learnability and ease of use higher for alarms with haptic information. These small but statistically significant improvements demonstrate that audiovisual colocalization and multisensory alarm design can improve user response times.

Indexed as

Clinical AlarmsWearable Electronic DevicesCuesHumansIntensive Care UnitsMonitoring, PhysiologicHapticsResponse timeSpatial colocalization

Identifiers

PMID37847469
OpenAlexW4387692572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.