Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37847419›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2024

Working memory during spontaneous migraine attacks: an fMRI study.

Amparo Ruiz-Tagle, Patrícia Figueiredo, Joana Pinto, Pedro Vilela, Isabel Pavão Martins, Raquel Gil-Gouveia

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Migraine and cognitive dysfunction: a narrative review.The journal of headache and pain · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Amparo Ruiz-TagleInstituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, ISR-Lisboa/LARSyS and Department of Bioengineering, Lisbon, Portugal. amparuiztagle@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4689-9536
Patrícia FigueiredoInstituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, ISR-Lisboa/LARSyS and Department of Bioengineering, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0743-0869
Joana PintoInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6863-1883
Pedro VilelaServiço de Neurradiologia, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2975-8566
Isabel Pavão MartinsCentro de Estudos Egas Moniz, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa, and Hospital de Santa Maria, CHULN, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9611-7400
Raquel Gil-GouveiaHeadache Center, Serviço de Neurologia, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4256-4256
University of Lisbon · PTHospital da Luz · PTUniversidade Católica Portuguesa · PTUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the neural correlates of working memory during a spontaneous migraine attack compared to the interictal phase, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

backgroundCognitive disturbances are commonly observed during migraine attacks, particularly in the headache phase. However, the neural basis of these changes remains unknown.

methodsIn a fMRI within-subject test-retest design study, eleven women (32 years of age, average) with episodic migraine were evaluated twice, first during a spontaneous migraine attack, and again in a pain-free period. Each session consisted in a cognitive assessment and fMRI while performing a working memory task (N-back).

resultsCognitive test scores were lower during the ictal session than in the pain-free session. Regions typically associated with working memory were activated during the N-back task in both sessions. A voxel wise between session comparison showed significantly greater activation in the left frontal pole and orbitofrontal cortex during the attack relative to the interictal phase.

conclusionMigraine patients exhibited greater activation of the left frontal pole and orbitofrontal cortex while executing a verbal working memory task during a spontaneous migraine attack when compared to the interictal state. Given the association of these regions with pain processing and inhibitory control, these findings suggest that patients recruit inhibitory areas to accomplish the cognitive task during migraine attacks, a neural signature of their cognitive difficulties.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMigraine DisordersFemaleHeadacheHumansMemory, Short-TermPrefrontal CortexCognitionfMRIN-backSpontaneous migraine attackTest-retest

Identifiers

PMID37847419
PMCPMC10858146
OpenAlexW4387692820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.