Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37847314›Full record

ReviewClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2024

The challenges of research data management in cardiovascular science: a DGK and DZHK position paper-executive summary.

Sabine Steffens, Katrin Schröder, Martina Krüger, Christoph Maack, Katrin Streckfuss-Bömeke, Johannes Backs, Rolf Backofen, Bettina Baeßler, Yvan Devaux, Ralf Gilsbach and 15 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Computational modelling of biological systems now and then: revisiting tools and visions from the beginning of the century.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Multiomic biomarkers after cardiac arrest.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2024
    Review
  5. Longer and better lives for patients with atrial fibrillation: the 9th AFNET/EHRA consensus conference.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Sabine Steffens *Institute for Cardiovascular Prevention (IPEK), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6892-9751
Katrin Schröder *Institute for Cardiovascular Physiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3099-526X
Martina KrügerInstitute of Cardiovascular Physiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2446-5526
Christoph MaackComprehensive Heart Failure Center (CHFC), University Clinic Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3694-4559
Katrin Streckfuss-BömekeClinic for Cardiology and Pneumology, Georg-August University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5137-7228
Johannes BacksInstitute of Experimental Cardiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2322-2699
Rolf BackofenFaculty of Medicine, Institute for Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8231-3323
Bettina BaeßlerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3244-3864
Yvan DevauxCardiovascular Research Unit, Department of Precision Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5321-8543
Ralf GilsbachInstitute of Experimental Cardiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0895-1535
Jordi HeijmanDepartment of Cardiology, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1418-108X
Jochen KnausInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7470-3791
Rafael KramannInstitute of Experimental Medicine and Systems Biology, RWTH Aachen Medical Faculty, Aachen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4048-6351
Dominik LinzDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4893-0824
Allyson L ListerOxford E-Research Centre (OeRC), Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Henrike MaatzMax Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9232-6272
Lars MaegdefesselDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5228-2634
Manuel MayrSchool of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0597-829X
Benjamin MederDZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0741-2633
Sara Y NussbeckDepartment of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1223-6494
Eva A Rog-ZielinskaInstitute for Experimental Cardiovascular Medicine, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Marcel H SchulzDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site RheinMain, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1252-3656
Albert SickmannLeibniz-Institut Für Analytische Wissenschaften, ISAS, E.V., Dortmund, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2388-5265
Gökhan YigitInstitute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2777-0198
Peter KohlInstitute for Experimental Cardiovascular Medicine, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. peter.kohl@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0416-6270

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/16/3/32406British Heart Foundation RG/F/21/110053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sharing and documentation of cardiovascular research data are essential for efficient use and reuse of data, thereby aiding scientific transparency, accelerating the progress of cardiovascular research and healthcare, and contributing to the reproducibility of research results. However, challenges remain. This position paper, written on behalf of and approved by the German Cardiac Society and German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, summarizes our current understanding of the challenges in cardiovascular research data management (RDM). These challenges include lack of time, awareness, incentives, and funding for implementing effective RDM; lack of standardization in RDM processes; a need to better identify meaningful and actionable data among the increasing volume and complexity of data being acquired; and a lack of understanding of the legal aspects of data sharing. While several tools exist to increase the degree to which data are findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR), more work is needed to lower the threshold for effective RDM not just in cardiovascular research but in all biomedical research, with data sharing and reuse being factored in at every stage of the scientific process. A culture of open science with FAIR research data should be fostered through education and training of early-career and established research professionals. Ultimately, FAIR RDM requires permanent, long-term effort at all levels. If outcomes can be shown to be superior and to promote better (and better value) science, modern RDM will make a positive difference to cardiovascular science and practice. The full position paper is available in the supplementary materials.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCardiovascular SystemData ManagementHeartHumansReproducibility of ResultsCardiac researchCardiologyFAIR dataMetadataResearch data management

Identifiers

PMID37847314
PMCPMC11026239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.