ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024
Permanent occlusion of the Eustachian tube: a retrospective study on reopening procedures.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and versatility of reopening procedures for the permanent occlusion of the cartilaginous Eustachian tube (POET) by analyzing four consecutive cases.
methodsThe study included all patients diagnosed with POET who suffered from Eustachian tube occlusion and glue ear. A combined approach of endoscopic transnasal/transoral laser surgery was utilized to reopen the POET. This was subsequently followed by balloon dilation (BET) and stenting for a duration of six weeks. In one distinct case, the Eustachian tube orifice was approached via a transtympanic method, where a balloon catheter was placed. The primary outcome measures targeted the success rate of reopening, which was quantified using audiological outcomes and Eustachian tube patency verified by a positive Valsalva maneuver.
resultsFour patients, with an age range of 14-62 years (mean age of 29.3 years), were subject to Eustachian tube reopening. The duration of follow-up varied between 10 and 24 months, averaging at 16.2 months. Notably, 75% of the surgically treated ears displayed no evidence of glue ear upon their last follow-up and showed restoration of Eustachian tube patency. The procedures were executed without any surgical complications. The causes for POET in these patients were heterogeneous: two were attributed to scarring post adenoidectomy, one to occlusion following orthognathic surgery and the remaining one due to prior radiotherapy treatment for squamous cell carcinoma located at the soft palate. DISCUSSION: Total occlusion of the cartilaginous Eustachian tube may be linked to persistent middle ear diseases. It is imperative to conduct nasopharyngeal endoscopy in these cases. The findings from this study suggest that the Eustachian tube reopening procedure is predominantly effective and safe for patients with POET stemming from a variety of pathologies. Future research should focus on exploring advanced stenting devices and necessitate longer follow-up periods for comprehensive understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.