Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37846789›Full record

ReviewJournal of Korean medical science2023

The Impact of Social Media on Vaccination: A Narrative Review.

Flinta Rodrigues, Nelly Ziade, Kanon Jatuworapruk, Carlo V Caballero-Uribe, Tayyeba Khursheed, Latika Gupta

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Korean medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
19.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Flinta Rodrigues *Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7724-3516
Nelly ZiadeRheumatology Department, Saint-Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4479-7678
Kanon Jatuworapruk *Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9301-8941
Carlo V Caballero-UribeUniversidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9845-8620
Tayyeba KhursheedDepartment of Rheumatology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3083-4458
Latika GuptaDepartment of Rheumatology, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2753-2990
King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College · INPakistan Institute of Medical Sciences · PKSaint Joseph University · LBSandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust · GBThammasat University · THUniversidad del Norte · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy poses a significant global health challenge, fueled by misinformation and anti-vaccination campaigns on social media platforms (SMPs). This study examines the influence of social media on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and non-COVID-19 vaccination in Asia during the peri-pandemic period. Through a comprehensive analysis of available literature, we aim to elucidate the role of SMPs in shaping vaccination attitudes and behaviors. The findings highlight the detrimental impact of social media on vaccination efforts and provide insights into addressing vaccine hesitancy during this critical period. A narrative review was conducted by searching the PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases from inception to May 26, 2022. Only English-language articles involving human participants from Asian countries were included in this review. Out of the 228 articles identified through the database search, 14 articles were included in the final analysis. The prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy or negative attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccines in Asian countries was found to be high, ranging from 20% to 55% across countries. Notably, reliance on SMPs for vaccine-related information was associated with a higher likelihood of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. This trend coincided with the proliferation of misinformation and conspiracy theories that portrayed COVID-19 vaccines as harmful during the pandemic. Similar patterns were observed for other types of vaccines, including polio, measles mumps and rubella, and diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccines. The use of SMPs was also found to be associated with increased fear among caregivers in Asian countries, as well as a 3-4 times higher likelihood of delayed immunization. SMPs negatively impact vaccine intent in Asia due to misinformation and anti-vaccination campaigns during the pandemic. However, they can be a powerful tool for healthcare providers and policymakers to promote informed decision-making. Efforts should focus on leveraging SMPs to disseminate reliable information and combat hesitancy, fostering a well-informed and vaccinated population in Asia.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaVaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunizationVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesImmunization, MisinformationSocial MediaVaccine Hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID37846789
PMCPMC10578995
OpenAlexW4387386337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.