ArticleCell transplantation
Outcomes of Second Anti-CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy (CART2) in Acute B Lymphoblastic Leukemia and the Impact of Allo-HSCT on Efficacy.
Article in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the potential of the convergence between extracellular vesicles and CAR technology as a novel immunotherapy approach.Journal of extracellular biology · 2024Review
- The Progress and Prospects of Immune Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Cancer.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For patients exhibiting a suboptimal response to the first chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (CART1) or relapse after remission, secondary CAR T-cell therapy (CART2) for the same target may be an option. We retrospectively analyzed patients with acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) receiving CD19 CART1 at our center (n = 84) to report the clinical outcomes of CART2 and to identify the factors that may influence the outcomes. Twenty-six patients received CART2 for suboptimal response or relapse post-CART1. The incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) after CART2 was 65.4% (17/26), with 11 cases classified as grade 1 (42.3%), four cases as grade 2 (15.4%), and two cases as grade 3 (7.7%). Neurotoxicity was observed in one patient (3.8%) after CART2 infusion. Fourteen patients (53.8%) achieved complete remission (CR) after CART2. CART2 exhibited an inferior response rate (CART2: 53.8%, 14/26; CART1: 81.0%, 64/79;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.