Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37846407›Full record

ArticleInternational Work-Conference on the Interplay between Natural and Artificial Computation

Electrical Stimulation Induced Current Distribution in Peripheral Nerves Varies Significantly with the Extent of Nerve Damage: A Computational Study Utilizing Convolutional Neural Network and Realistic Nerve Models.

Jinze Du, Andres Morales, Pragya Kosta, Jean-Marie C Bouteiller, Gema Martinez, David Warren, Eduardo Fernandez, Gianluca Lazzi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International Work-Conference on the Interplay between Natural and Artificial Computation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jinze DuDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2173-8915
Andres MoralesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5105-9120
Pragya KostaInstitute for Technology and Medical Systems Innovation (ITEMS), Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2141-8700
Jean-Marie C BouteillerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3069-0826
Gema MartinezInstitute of Bioengineering, University Miguel Hernandez, Elche and CIBER-BBN, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9795-2846
David WarrenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6216-931X
Eduardo FernandezInstitute of Bioengineering, University Miguel Hernandez, Elche and CIBER-BBN, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7052-6011
Gianluca LazziDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6365-7283
University of Southern California · USBiomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine · ESUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Supplement to CRCNS US-Spain: Computational Modeling of PNS StimulationR01EB029271 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI LAZZI, GIANLUCA · 2019 to 2021
$1.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although electrical stimulation is an established treatment option for multiple central nervous and peripheral nervous system diseases, its effects on the tissue and subsequent safety of the stimulation are not well understood. Therefore, it is crucial to design stimulation protocols that maximize therapeutic efficacy while avoiding any potential tissue damage. Further, the stimulation levels need to be adjusted regularly to ensure that they are safe even with the changes to the nerve due to long-term stimulation. Using the latest advances in computing capabilities and machine learning approaches, we developed computational models of peripheral nerve stimulation based on very high-resolution cross-sectional images of the nerves. We generated nerve models constructed from non-stimulated (healthy) and over-stimulated (damaged) rat sciatic nerves to examine how the current density distribution is affected by nerve damage. Using our in-house numerical solver, the Admittance Method (AM), we computed the induced current distribution inside the nerves and compared the current penetration for healthy and damaged nerves. Our computational results indicate that when the nerve is damaged, primarily evidenced by the decreased nerve fiber packing, the current penetrates deeper inside the nerve than in the healthy case. As safety limits for electrical stimulation of biological tissue are still debated, we ultimately aim to utilize our computational models to determine refined safety criteria and help design safer and more efficacious electrical stimulation protocols.

Indexed as

Computational modelingElectrical stimulationPeripheral nerveTissue safety

Identifiers

PMID37846407
PMCPMC10578432
OpenAlexW4285269058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.