ArticleInternational Work-Conference on the Interplay between Natural and Artificial Computation
Electrical Stimulation Induced Current Distribution in Peripheral Nerves Varies Significantly with the Extent of Nerve Damage: A Computational Study Utilizing Convolutional Neural Network and Realistic Nerve Models.
Article in International Work-Conference on the Interplay between Natural and Artificial Computation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toward Safety Protocols for Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS): A Computational and Experimental Approach.Bioelectromagnetics · 2025Article
- Machine learning enables non-Gaussian investigation of changes to peripheral nerves related to electrical stimulation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Computational optimization of delivery parameters to guide the development of targeted Nasal spray.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Although electrical stimulation is an established treatment option for multiple central nervous and peripheral nervous system diseases, its effects on the tissue and subsequent safety of the stimulation are not well understood. Therefore, it is crucial to design stimulation protocols that maximize therapeutic efficacy while avoiding any potential tissue damage. Further, the stimulation levels need to be adjusted regularly to ensure that they are safe even with the changes to the nerve due to long-term stimulation. Using the latest advances in computing capabilities and machine learning approaches, we developed computational models of peripheral nerve stimulation based on very high-resolution cross-sectional images of the nerves. We generated nerve models constructed from non-stimulated (healthy) and over-stimulated (damaged) rat sciatic nerves to examine how the current density distribution is affected by nerve damage. Using our in-house numerical solver, the Admittance Method (AM), we computed the induced current distribution inside the nerves and compared the current penetration for healthy and damaged nerves. Our computational results indicate that when the nerve is damaged, primarily evidenced by the decreased nerve fiber packing, the current penetrates deeper inside the nerve than in the healthy case. As safety limits for electrical stimulation of biological tissue are still debated, we ultimately aim to utilize our computational models to determine refined safety criteria and help design safer and more efficacious electrical stimulation protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.