Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37846386›Full record

ArticleAdvances in ophthalmology practice and research

A preliminary observation on rod cell photobiomodulation in treating diabetic macular edema.

Zhiqing Chen, Binbin Chen, Peike Hu, Haipeng Liu, Dingchang Zheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in ophthalmology practice and research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhiqing ChenEye Centre, The Second Affiliated Hospital of the School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Binbin ChenEye Centre, The Second Affiliated Hospital of the School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Peike HuEye Centre, The Second Affiliated Hospital of the School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Haipeng LiuResearch Centre for Intelligent Healthcare, University of Coventry, Coventry, UK.
Dingchang ZhengResearch Centre for Intelligent Healthcare, University of Coventry, Coventry, UK.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNCoventry (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of photobiomodulation (PBM) in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: It was a single-center, self-controlled prospective study. The clinical records of 12 diabetic retinopathy patients (5 males and 7 females, 20 eyes in total) who were treated with PBM for DME at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, were analyzed. The mean age was 56 (26-68) years. All the participants received PBM treatment during darkness at night in no less than 5 days per week and no less than 8 ​h per day. In the baseline check and follow-up checks (1, 2, 6, 10, and 12 months after the start of treatment), the best-corrected visual acuity, the thickness of the retina in the macula, and the changes of the fundus lesions were observed. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the results before and after treatment. Results: No fundus complication was observed during follow-up checks. In baseline and 12-month follow-up checks, the best-corrected visual acuity was 71.75 ​± ​12.47 and 79.50 ​± ​10.85, maximal retinal thickness in macular area was 390.95 ​± ​77.12 ​μm and 354.13 ​± ​55.03 ​μm, average retinal thickness in macular area was 334.25 ​± ​36.45 ​μm and 314.31 ​± ​33.28 ​μm, foveal thickness was 287.00 ​± ​46.79 ​μm and 265.63 ​± ​67.14 ​μm. The best-corrected visual acuity, average retinal thickness in macular area in consecutive follow-up results except that in the 1st month showed significant difference compared with baseline results. There were significant difference between every follow-up result and baseline result of maximal retinal thickness in macular area ( Conclusions: PBM is a safe and effective treatment of DME, which deserves further investigation.

Indexed as

Dark adaptationDiabetic macular edemaDiabetic retinopathyPhotobiomodulationRod cells

Identifiers

PMID37846386
PMCPMC10577862
OpenAlexW4224640196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.