ReviewAdvances in ophthalmology practice and research2021
Differences in the involved sites among different types of demyelinating optic neuritis in traditional MRI examination: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Advances in ophthalmology practice and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic characterization of pathological and functional deterioration in a mouse model of optic neuritis related to neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Serum and Cerebrospinal Fluid Testing in Optic Neuropathy Patients with Malignant Tumors.Disease markers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a significant role in assessing optic neuropathy and providing more detailed information about the lesion of the visual pathway to help differentiate optic neuritis from other visual disorders. This study aims to systematically review the literature and verify if there is a real difference in lesion location among different demyelinating optic neuritis (DON) subtypes. Methods: A systematic search was conducted including 8 electronic databases and related resources from the establishment of the database to August 25th, 2020. We classified DON into 5 subtypes and divided the visual pathways into five segments mainly comparing the differences in the involved visual pathway sites of different subtypes. Results: Fifty-five studies were included in the analysis, and the abnormal rate was as high as 92% during the acute phase (within 4 weeks of symptom onset). With respect to lesion location, the orbital segment of the optic nerve was the most frequently involved (87%), whereas optic tract involvement was very rare. Involvement of the orbital segment was more common in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-related optic neuritis (MOG-ON) (78%) and chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy (CRION) (81%), while the lesion was found to be located more posteriorly in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-related optic neuritis (NMOSD-ON). With respect to lesion length, approximately 77% of MOG-ON patients had lesions involving more than half of the optic nerve length. Conclusions: MRI examination is recommended for DON patients in the acute phase. In MOG-ON, anterior involvement is more common and the involved length is mostly more than 1/2 of the optic nerve length, whereas posterior involvement, intracranial segment, optic chiasm, or optic tract, is more common in NMOSD-ON. Prospero registration number: CRD42020222430 (25-11-2020).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.