ArticlePorto biomedical journal
Diagnosis and referral of patients with AL amyloidosis in Portugal: results from a Delphi panel.
Article in Porto biomedical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- New trends in AA amyloidosis with renal involvement: a single-center experience.Jornal brasileiro de nefrologiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Light chain amyloidosis (AL) is a complex disorder defined by the extracellular deposition of insoluble amyloid fibrils formed by intact or fragmented immunoglobulin light chains, leading to cell dysfunction, rapid organ deterioration, and, ultimately, death. Although the clinical presentation of AL is directly connected to organ involvement, signs and symptoms of AL are frequently nonspecific, misinterpreted, and late recognized. Thus, an early diagnosis combined with effective therapies to cease disease progression and rescue organ function is essential. The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge and characterize the current clinical practice regarding AL diagnosis and referral among Portuguese physicians. A Delphi-like panel (one round only) with a group of national experts from different medical specialties (cardiology, hematology, internal medicine, nephrology, and neurology) was carried out online, in which 30 statements were classified using a 4-point Likert scale. For each statement, the consensus level was set at 70% for "fully agree/disagree" and the majority level was defined as >70% in agreement or disagreement. Although the results suggest the existence of adequate general knowledge of AL amyloidosis, they also disclosed the necessity to raise awareness for this disease. Overall, this Delphi panel revealed a high lack of consensus regarding the diagnosis and early management of patients with AL among different specialties despite the qualified majority obtained in 26 statements. An optimized strategy for AL early diagnosis, transversal to several medical fields, is urgently needed. Moreover, referral centers with access to diagnostic technology and a network of diverse specialties should be established to foster an early diagnosis and better disease approach to boost the possibility of a better outcome for patients with AL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.