ArticleCureus2023
Comparing the Efficiency of a Newly Designed Spring With the T Loop for Buccal Canine Disimpaction: A Finite Element Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Finite element analysis of impacted canine disimpaction: effects of anchorage systems and T-loop gable bend angles.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disimpacting a buccally impacted canine precisely using frictionless mechanics is a challenge in orthodontics. Various mechanics can be used for aligning an impacted canine and a spring is one of the most versatile methods of accomplishing it. The present study describes a newly designed spring for canine disimpaction using the finite element method (FEM) model. In the present study, the efficiency of the newly designed spring was compared with the T loop. The FEM model of the maxilla was prepared. Harsha's Canine Disimpaction (HCD) spring and T loop with no pre-activation bends were utilized to disimpact the left maxillary canine using a 0.017 x 0.025 inch titanium molybdenum alloy wire. Efficiency of both springs in all dimensions (sagittal, vertical and transverse) was compared. Stress acting on the bone and teeth and number of activations needed for disimpaction were evaluated when the spring was activated by 3 mm. A movement/displacement of 0.8, 0.4 and 0.1 mm was seen in the sagittal (X), transverse (Y) and vertical (Z) planes, respectively, with the HCD spring, and 0.4, 0.1 and 0.1 mm seen in the X, Y and Z planes, respectively, with the T loop. A total of 12-13 and 80 activations were required as per the FEM simulation for disimpaction using the HCD spring and T loop, respectively. Stress concentration in the disto-cervical region was observed during disimpaction with both HCD spring and T loop. Within the constraints and limitations of the present study, it can be concluded that the HCD spring requires lesser activation and brings about greater control of canine disimpaction in all three dimensions when compared to the T loop.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.