ArticleCureus2023
Assessing the Impact of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Satisfaction, Quality of Life, and Cost-Effectiveness in Saudi Patients With Gallstone Disease: A Comprehensive Cross-Sectional Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCholelithiasis, or gallstone disease, is a prevalent medical condition with substantial global implications. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the dominant surgical solution for treating various biliary conditions in affluent countries due to its numerous benefits, such as shorter hospital stays and reduced costs. An assessment of postoperative recovery, patient satisfaction, and quality of life (QoL) is crucial to judge the success of any medical procedure regarding long-term patient well-being. Given the scarcity of research on the satisfaction, QoL, and cost-effectiveness of LC among Saudi patients, this study seeks to fill this gap.
methodsTo achieve the study's objectives, a cross-sectional research study was conducted from January to December 2023, focusing on Saudi patients who had received LC for gallstone disease. We utilized an extensive questionnaire to determine patient satisfaction, QoL, and the perceived value of LC, which combined closed and open-ended questions to provide a holistic understanding. Additionally, an in-depth literature review was performed to compare our findings with existing research.
resultsOur survey received answers from 886 Saudi LC patients. Generally, participants showed satisfaction with LC, though complications were reported in a significant number of cases. However, a minority of participants were dissatisfied. Most respondents indicated a moderate enhancement in their QoL postsurgery. Notably, demographic factors like gender, age, and employment status had profound effects on satisfaction and QoL, with male participants more likely to report higher satisfaction and QoL than females.
conclusionOur data firmly support the ongoing use of LC as the preferred surgical technique for treating biliary diseases in Saudi Arabia. They emphasize the benefits of personalizing care based on patient demographics to improve the overall experience. Proper communication, thorough preoperative planning, and attentive postoperative care are essential for achieving the best outcomes. Despite these findings, more research is needed, focusing on different patient demographics and comparing LC with other treatment methods to enhance our understanding of gallstone disease management in the Saudi context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.