ArticleCureus2023
Blood Utilization Trends in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Seven-Year Retrospective Study in a Teaching Hospital in Sikkim, India.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transfusion risk assessment for cesarean delivery: a preoperative tool to guide blood utilization.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangueArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUnutilized cross-matched blood due to excess cross-match requisitions results in unnecessary wastage of inventory, time, labor, and financial resources. This retrospective cross-sectional study aims to assess the blood utilization practices in obstetrics/gynecology (OB/GYN) over a period of seven years with respect to "blood utilization indices" and standard recommendations. MATERIAL AND
methodsCross-match requisitions from the OB/GYN Department over a period of seven years (2012-2018) were selected and included in the study using a suitable sampling technique. Patient details were retrieved from the Hospital Information System (HIS) database. The preoperative crossmatch requisitions and blood utilization data were recorded. "Blood utilization indices" and whole blood/component utilization patterns were analyzed.
resultsA total of 894 units of blood were cross-matched for 523 patients included in the study. A total of 305 of these patients were transfused with 445 units. During the initial phase of the study (2012-2014), the average cross-match-to-transfusion ratio (CTR, 6.6), transfusion probability (12.3), transfusion index (0.23), and component utilization (4%) were in marked deviation from recommended "blood utilization indices." This was in contrast with the later phase of the study (2015-2018) wherein the average CTR (1.5), transfusion probability (69.3), transfusion index (1.3), and component utilization (91.8%) were compliant with recommended "blood utilization indices."
conclusionA progressive improvement in blood utilization practices was observed in the OB/GYN Department during the study period. Awareness campaigns have contributed to the implementation of rational and judicious blood transfusion practices in our center.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.