Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37846186›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2023

Core Needle Biopsy Accuracy for Androgen Receptor Expression in Invasive Breast Cancer.

Marcelle Morais Dos Santos, Antonio Luiz Frasson, Vinicius Duval da Silva, Aluísio de Castro Antunes Maciel, Guilherme Watte, Gustavo Werutsky, Tomás Reinert, André Poisl Fay

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marcelle Morais Dos SantosDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6834-6863
Antonio Luiz FrassonDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1860-6898
Vinicius Duval da SilvaDepartment of Pathology, Hospital do Câncer de Barretos, Barretos, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3515-0263
Aluísio de Castro Antunes MacielDepartment of Pathology, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4626-9094
Guilherme WatteDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6948-3982
Gustavo WerutskySchool of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6271-105X
Tomás ReinertSchool of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4715-1415
André Poisl FaySchool of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8588-7012
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul · BRCentro de Pesquisas Oncológicas · BRHospital de Câncer de Barretos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBreast cancer (BC) biomarkers, such as hormone receptors expression, are crucial to guide therapy in BC patients. Antiandrogens have been studied in BC; however, limited data are available on androgen receptor (AR) expression test methodology. We aim to report the core needle biopsy (CNB) accuracy for AR expression in BC.

methodsPatients diagnosed with stage I-III invasive BC from a single institution were included. Androgen receptor expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using 1 and 10% cutoff and the AR expression in surgical specimens (SS) was the gold standard. Kappa coefficients were used to evaluate the intraprocedural agreement.

resultsA total of 72 patients were included, with a mean age of 61 years old and 84% were Luminal A or B tumors. The prevalence of AR expression in all BC samples was 87.5% using a cutoff ≥ 10% in SS. With a cutoff value ≥ 1%, CNB had an accuracy of 95.8% (Kappa value = 0.645; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.272-1.000;

conclusionCore needle biopsy has good accuracy in evaluating AR expression in BC. The accuracy of CNB decreases with higher cutoff values for AR positivity.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAndrogensBiomarkers, TumorBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleFemaleHumansMiddle AgedReceptors, AndrogenAndrogensBiomarkers, TumorReceptors, Androgen

Identifiers

PMID37846186
PMCPMC10579921
OpenAlexW4387677924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.