ArticleCartilage2024
Article in Cartilage, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAfter traumatic knee injuries, chondral fragments can avulse off bone with the progeny fragment becoming a loose body. The loose fragment may be larger than expected when trying to surgically repair the fragment back to its original site. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a loose chondral fragment from the lateral femur condyle would increase in size and weight after soaking in normal saline (NS) for 14 days.
designTwelve 6-mm OAT (osteoarticular transfer) plugs were harvested from 6 cadaver knees on the lateral femoral condyle to simulate a chondral fragment. The chondral fragments were then placed inside an airtight specimen container with NS (0.9% sodium chloride) and were measured over 14 days.
resultsAfter 14 days, the chondral fragments showed no increase in diameter as they measured an average of 5.567 ± 0.448 mm on Day 1 and 5.702 ± 0.253 mm on Day 14 (
conclusionsChondral fragments in NS increase in mass and thickness over time, but do not change in diameter. When surgeons are evaluating loose chondral fragments for fixation, they should consider that these fragments may appear thicker than the recipient location.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.