ArticleGenome biology2023
The evolution and mutational robustness of chromatin accessibility in Drosophila.
Article in Genome biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emergence Biases in Molecular Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Review
- Machine learning for evolutionary genetics and molecular evolution.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2026Review
- De Novo Genes: Current Status and Future Goals.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- ATAC-seq in Emerging Model Organisms: Challenges and Strategies.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2025Review
- Gene regulatory networks and essential transcription factors for de novo-originated genes.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- The evolution and mutational robustness of chromatin accessibility in Drosophila.Genome biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe evolution of genomic regulatory regions plays a critical role in shaping the diversity of life. While this process is primarily sequence-dependent, the enormous complexity of biological systems complicates the understanding of the factors underlying regulation and its evolution. Here, we apply deep neural networks as a tool to investigate the sequence determinants underlying chromatin accessibility in different species and tissues of Drosophila.
resultsWe train hybrid convolution-attention neural networks to accurately predict ATAC-seq peaks using only local DNA sequences as input. We show that our models generalize well across substantially evolutionarily diverged species of insects, implying that the sequence determinants of accessibility are highly conserved. Using our model to examine species-specific gains in accessibility, we find evidence suggesting that these regions may be ancestrally poised for evolution. Using in silico mutagenesis, we show that accessibility can be accurately predicted from short subsequences in each example. However, in silico knock-out of these sequences does not qualitatively impair classification, implying that accessibility is mutationally robust. Subsequently, we show that accessibility is predicted to be robust to large-scale random mutation even in the absence of selection. Conversely, simulations under strong selection demonstrate that accessibility can be extremely malleable despite its robustness. Finally, we identify motifs predictive of accessibility, recovering both novel and previously known motifs.
conclusionsThese results demonstrate the conservation of the sequence determinants of accessibility and the general robustness of chromatin accessibility, as well as the power of deep neural networks to explore fundamental questions in regulatory genomics and evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.