Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37845677›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Proposal of neural network model for neurocognitive rehabilitation and its comparison with fuzzy expert system model.

Martin Kotyrba, Hashim Habiballa, Eva Volna, Robert Jarusek, Pavel Smolka, Martin Prasek, Marek Malina, Vladena Jaremova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin KotyrbaDepartment of Informatics and Computers , University of Ostrava, Faculty of Science, 30.dubna 22, Ostrava, 70103, Czech Republic.
Hashim HabiballaDepartment of Informatics and Computers , University of Ostrava, Faculty of Science, 30.dubna 22, Ostrava, 70103, Czech Republic.
Eva VolnaDepartment of Informatics and Computers , University of Ostrava, Faculty of Science, 30.dubna 22, Ostrava, 70103, Czech Republic. eva.volna@osu.cz.
Robert JarusekDepartment of Informatics and Computers , University of Ostrava, Faculty of Science, 30.dubna 22, Ostrava, 70103, Czech Republic.
Pavel SmolkaDepartment of Informatics and Computers , University of Ostrava, Faculty of Science, 30.dubna 22, Ostrava, 70103, Czech Republic.
Martin PrasekDepartment of Informatics and Computers , University of Ostrava, Faculty of Science, 30.dubna 22, Ostrava, 70103, Czech Republic.
Marek MalinaDepartment of Informatics and Computers , University of Ostrava, Faculty of Science, 30.dubna 22, Ostrava, 70103, Czech Republic.
Vladena JaremovaUniversity Hospital of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790/5, Ostrava, 70852, Czech Republic.
University of Ostrava · CZUniversity Hospital Ostrava · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article focuses on the development of algorithms for a smart neurorehabilitation system, whose core is made up of artificial neural networks. The authors of the article have proposed a completely unique transfer of ACE-R results to the CHC model. This unique approach allows for the saturation of the CHC model domains according to modified ACE-R factor analysis. The outputs of the proposed algorithm thus enable the automatic creation of a personalized and optimized neurorehabilitation plan for individual patients to train their cognitive functions. A set of tasks in 6 levels of difficulty (level 1 to level 6) was designed for each of the nine CHC model domains. For each patient, the results of the ACE-R screening helped deter-mine the specific CHC domains to be rehabilitated, as well as the initial gaming level for rehabilitation in each domain. The proposed artificial neural network algorithm was adapted to real data from 703 patients. Experimental outputs were compared to the outputs of the initially designed fuzzy expert system, which was trained on the same real data, and all outputs from both systems were statistically evaluated against expert conclusions that were available. It is evident from the conducted experimental study that the smart neurorehabilitation system using artificial neural networks achieved significantly better results than the neurorehabilitation system whose core is a fuzzy expert system. Both algorithms are implemented into a comprehensive neurorehabilitation portal (Eddie), which was supported by a research project from the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic.

Indexed as

Expert SystemsNeurological RehabilitationAlgorithmsFuzzy LogicHumansNeural Networks, ComputerACE-RCHCFuzzy expert system modelNeural network modelNeurocognitive rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID37845677
PMCPMC10580608
OpenAlexW4387673646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.