Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37845660›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2023

Randomized controlled phase III trial to investigate superiority of robot-assisted gastrectomy over laparoscopic gastrectomy for clinical stage T1-4aN0-3 gastric cancer patients (JCOG1907, MONA LISA study): a study protocol.

Rie Makuuchi, Masanori Terashima, Mitsumi Terada, Junki Mizusawa, Ryosuke Kita, Masanori Tokunaga, Takeshi Omori, Toshiyasu Ojima, Kazuhisa Ehara, Masaya Watanabe and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2025 (7th edition).Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Guideline
  2. A systematic review on the effectiveness of robot-assisted minimally invasive gastrectomy.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of long-term outcomes of robotic gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastrectomy using the modified age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Clinical advantages of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer over conventional laparoscopic approach: a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide registry database in Japan.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Robotic gastrectomy: Research progress and practical challenges].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Rie MakuuchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Masanori TerashimaDivision of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-Cho, Sunto-Gun, Shizuoka, Japan. m.terashima@scchr.jp.
Mitsumi TeradaDepartment of International Clinical Development, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Junki MizusawaJapan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryosuke KitaJapan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masanori TokunagaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi OmoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Toshiyasu OjimaSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University Scholl of Medicine, Wakayama, Japan.
Kazuhisa EharaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Masaya WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yoshitomo YanagimotoDepartment of Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Souya NunobeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Takahiro KinoshitaDepartment of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Seiji ItoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yasunori NishidaDepartment of Surgery, Keiyukai Sapporo Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Jun HiharaDepartment of Surgery, Hiroshima City North Medical Center Asa Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Narikazu BokuDepartment of Oncology and General Medicine, IMSUT Hospital, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukinori KurokawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Takaki YoshikawaDepartment of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Stomach Cancer Study Group of Japan Clinical Oncology Group
Japan Clinical Cancer Research Organization · JPJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPHiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital · JPKeiyukai Sapporo Hospital · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPOsaka International Cancer Institute · JPSaitama Cancer Center · JPShizuoka Cancer Center · JPShizuoka General Hospital · JPThe University of Osaka · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPTokyo National Hospital · JPToyonaka Municipal Hospital · JPUniversity of Tokyo Hospital · JPWakayama Medical University · JP

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP23ck0106844National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund 29-A-3, 2020-J-3, 2023-J-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) is considered a standard treatment for clinical stage I gastric cancer. Nevertheless, LG has some drawbacks, such as motion restriction and difficulties in spatial perception. Robot-assisted gastrectomy (RG) overcomes these drawbacks by using articulated forceps, tremor-filtering capability, and high-resolution three-dimensional imaging, and it is expected to enable more precise and safer procedures than LG for gastric cancer. However, robust evidence based on a large-scale randomized study is lacking.

methodsWe are performing a randomized controlled phase III study to investigate the superiority of RG over LG for clinical T1-2N0-2 gastric cancer in terms of safety. In total, 1,040 patients are planned to be enrolled from 46 Japanese institutions over 5 years. The primary endpoint is the incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications, including anastomotic leakage, pancreatic fistula, and intra-abdominal abscess of Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥ II. The secondary endpoints are the incidence of all CD grade ≥ II and ≥ IIIA postoperative complications, the incidence of CD grade ≥ IIIA postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications, relapse-free survival, overall survival, the proportion of RG completion, the proportion of LG completion, the proportion of conversion to open surgery, the proportion of operation-related death, and short-term surgical outcomes. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group Protocol Review Committee approved this study protocol in January 2020. Approval from the institutional review board was obtained before starting patient enrollment in each institution. Patient enrollment began in March 2020. We revised the protocol to expand the eligibility criteria to T1-4aN0-3 in July 2022 based on the results of randomized trials of LG demonstrating non-inferiority of LG to open surgery for survival outcomes in advanced gastric cancer. DISCUSSION: This is the first multicenter randomized controlled trial to confirm the superiority of RG over LG in terms of safety. This study will demonstrate whether RG is superior for gastric cancer.

trial registrationThe protocol of JCOG1907 was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000039825 ( http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm ). Date of Registration: March 16, 2020. Date of First Participant Enrollment: April 1, 2020.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresStomach NeoplasmsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicEquivalence Trials as TopicGastrectomyHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeMinimally invasive surgeryMulticenter studyPostoperative complicationRandomized controlled trialRobotic surgeryStomach neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID37845660
PMCPMC10580580
OpenAlexW4387692837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.