Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37845470›Full record

ReviewJournal of nephrology2024

ABCs of hemodiafiltration prescription: The Pisa style.

Emanuela Mangione, Domenico Giannese, Adamasco Cupisti, Vincenzo Panichi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emanuela MangioneNephrology, Transplants and Dialysis Unit, AOUP, Via Paradisa 2, 50625, Pisa, Italy.
Domenico GianneseNephrology, Transplants and Dialysis Unit, AOUP, Via Paradisa 2, 50625, Pisa, Italy.
Adamasco CupistiNephrology, Transplants and Dialysis Unit, AOUP, Via Paradisa 2, 50625, Pisa, Italy. adamasco.cupisti@med.unipi.it.ORCID 0000-0002-8995-936X
Vincenzo PanichiNephrology, Transplants and Dialysis Unit, AOUP, Via Paradisa 2, 50625, Pisa, Italy. vincenzo.panichi@unipi.it.
University of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In end-stage kidney disease patients, hemodiafiltration, a mixed diffusive-convective technique, has shown beneficial effects in terms of improvement of anemia, inflammation, mineral bone disorders, malnutrition and cardiovascular stability. Greater convective volume exchange was also associated with improved overall and cardiovascular survival. However, absolute target threshold volume would be difficult to define and achieve in daily clinical practice, mainly because of differences in patient size. Convective volumes standardized for body surface area would appear to be the simplest approach in clinical practice. Several factors can affect achievement of optimal convective volume, with vascular access being the main limiting factor. Based on our own clinical experience, hemodiafiltration is a more effective and preferable dialysis technique but only when a target convective volume greater than 20 L can be achieved. Conversely, standard high flux hemodialysis or expanded hemodialysis may be helpful and valuable alternative dialysis techniques.

Indexed as

HemodiafiltrationKidney Failure, ChronicHumansTreatment OutcomeESKDHDFHemodiafiltrationStandardized convective volumeTailored dialysis

Identifiers

PMID37845470
OpenAlexW4387666768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.