Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37845342›Full record

ArticleActa pharmacologica Sinica2024

Reexamining the effects of drug loading on the in vivo performance of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin.

Yi-Fei Yu, Er-Can Wu, Shi-Qi Lin, Yu-Xiu Chu, Yang Yang, Feng Pan, Tian-Hao Ding, Jun Qian, Kuan Jiang, Chang-You Zhan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yi-Fei YuDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences & Department of Pharmacy, Shanghai Pudong Hospital & State Key Laboratory of Molecular Engineering of Polymers, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Er-Can WuSchool of Pharmacy, Fudan University & Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Shi-Qi LinDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences & Department of Pharmacy, Shanghai Pudong Hospital & State Key Laboratory of Molecular Engineering of Polymers, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Yu-Xiu ChuDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences & Department of Pharmacy, Shanghai Pudong Hospital & State Key Laboratory of Molecular Engineering of Polymers, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Yang YangDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences & Department of Pharmacy, Shanghai Pudong Hospital & State Key Laboratory of Molecular Engineering of Polymers, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Feng PanSchool of Pharmacy, Fudan University & Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Tian-Hao DingDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences & Department of Pharmacy, Shanghai Pudong Hospital & State Key Laboratory of Molecular Engineering of Polymers, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Jun QianSchool of Pharmacy, Fudan University & Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai, 201203, China. qianjun@fudan.edu.cn.
Kuan JiangDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences & Department of Pharmacy, Shanghai Pudong Hospital & State Key Laboratory of Molecular Engineering of Polymers, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China. jiangkuan@fudan.edu.cn.
Chang-You ZhanDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences & Department of Pharmacy, Shanghai Pudong Hospital & State Key Laboratory of Molecular Engineering of Polymers, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China. cyzhan@fudan.edu.cn.
Fudan University · CNPudong Medical Center · CNEye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Higher drug loading employed in nanoscale delivery platforms is a goal that researchers have long sought after. But such viewpoint remains controversial because the impacts that nanocarriers bring about on bodies have been seriously overlooked. In the present study we investigated the effects of drug loading on the in vivo performance of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). We prepared PLDs with two different drug loading rates: high drug loading rate, H-Dox, 12.9% w/w Dox/HSPC; low drug loading rate, L-Dox, 2.4% w/w Dox/HSPC (L-Dox had about 5 folds drug carriers of H-Dox at the same Dox dose). The pharmaceutical properties and biological effects of H-Dox and L-Dox were compared in mice, rats or 4T1 subcutaneous tumor-bearing mice. We showed that the lowering of doxorubicin loading did not cause substantial shifts to the pharmaceutical properties of PLDs such as in vitro and in vivo stability (stable), anti-tumor effect (equivalent effective), as well as tissue and cellular distribution. Moreover, it was even more beneficial for mitigating the undesired biological effects caused by PLDs, through prolonging blood circulation and alleviating cutaneous accumulation in the presence of pre-existing anti-PEG Abs due to less opsonins (e.g. IgM and C3) deposition on per particle. Our results warn that the effects of drug loading would be much more convoluted than expected due to the complex intermediation between nanocarriers and bodies, urging independent investigation for each individual delivery platform to facilitate clinical translation and application.

Indexed as

DoxorubicinPolyethylene GlycolsAnimalsCell Line, TumorDrug CarriersMiceRatsDoxorubicinDrug Carriersliposomal doxorubicinPolyethylene Glycolsanti-PEG antibodycomplementdrug loadingin vivo performancePEGylated liposomal doxorubicin

Identifiers

PMID37845342
PMCPMC10834505
OpenAlexW4387670290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.