Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37845341›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2023

The effectiveness of the Wim Hof method on cardiac autonomic function, blood pressure, arterial compliance, and different psychological parameters.

Sascha Ketelhut, Dario Querciagrossa, Xavier Bisang, Xavier Metry, Eric Borter, Claudio R Nigg

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sascha KetelhutInstitute of Sport Science, University of Bern, Bremgartenstrasse 145, 3012, Bern, Switzerland. sascha.ketelhut@unibe.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6875-9625
Dario QuerciagrossaInstitute of Sport Science, University of Bern, Bremgartenstrasse 145, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Xavier BisangInstitute of Sport Science, University of Bern, Bremgartenstrasse 145, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Xavier MetryInstitute of Sport Science, University of Bern, Bremgartenstrasse 145, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Eric BorterInstitute of Sport Science, University of Bern, Bremgartenstrasse 145, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Claudio R NiggInstitute of Sport Science, University of Bern, Bremgartenstrasse 145, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2897-4689

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Wim Hof method (WHM) is a multi-disciplinary approach to physical and mental well-being combining cold exposure, breathing exercises, and meditation. This study evaluated the effects of a 15 days WHM intervention on cardiovascular parameters at rest and during a cold pressor test (CPT), as well as on various psychological parameters. Forty two participants were randomized into an intervention (IG) and a control group. Throughout the 15 days intervention, the IG performed the WHM daily. Before and after the intervention, systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse wave velocity (PWV), heart rate (HR), root mean sum of squared distance (RMSSD), and standard deviation of RR-intervals (SDNN) were assessed at rest and during a CPT. Furthermore, perceived stress (PSS), positive affect (PANAS+), negative affect (PANAS-), and subjective vitality (trait (SVSt) and state (SVSs)) was determined. No significant time × group interactions could be detected in HR (p = 0.709); RMSSD (p = 0.820), SDNN (p = 0.186), SBP (p = 0.839), DBP (p = 0.318), PWV (p = 0.983), PANAS+ (p = 0.427), PANAS- (p = 0.614), SVSt (p = 0.760), SVSs (p = 0.366), and PSS (p = 0.364). No significant time × group effects could be detected during the CPT (ΔHR: p = 0.596; ΔSBP: p = 0.366; ΔDBP: p = 0.999; ΔPWV: p = 0.635; perceived pain: p = 0.231). Performing the WHM daily did not exert positive effects on cardiovascular and psychological parameters.

Indexed as

Arterial PressurePulse Wave AnalysisArteriesAutonomic Nervous SystemBlood PressureHeart RateHumans

Identifiers

PMID37845341
PMCPMC10579249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.