Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37845296›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2023

Endotoxin removal therapy with Polymyxin B immobilized fiber column: a single center experience from EUPHAS2 registry.

Edoardo Forin, Giulia Lorenzoni, Ricard Ferrer, Massimo De Cal, Monica Zanella, Nicola Marchionna, Dario Gregori, Francesco Forfori, Anna Lorenzin, Vinicio Danzi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Edoardo ForinInternational Renal Research Institute of Vicenza Institute of Vicenza, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
Giulia LorenzoniUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Ricard FerrerShock, Organ Dysfunction, and Resuscitation Research Group (SODIR), Institut de Recerca Vall d'Hebron (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
Massimo De CalInternational Renal Research Institute of Vicenza Institute of Vicenza, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
Monica ZanellaDepartment of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
Nicola MarchionnaDepartment of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
Dario GregoriUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Francesco ForforiDepartment of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, The University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Anna LorenzinInternational Renal Research Institute of Vicenza Institute of Vicenza, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
Vinicio DanziDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
Claudio RoncoInternational Renal Research Institute of Vicenza Institute of Vicenza, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
Silvia De RosaInternational Renal Research Institute of Vicenza Institute of Vicenza, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy. silvia.derosa@unitn.it.
International Renal Research Institute of Vicenza · ITOspedale San Bortolo · ITUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the precise clinical indication for initiation of PMX-HA is widely debated in the literature, a proper patient selection and timing of treatment delivery might play a critical role in the clinical course of a specific subphenotype of septic shock (endotoxic shock). In light of this view, since 2019, we have introduced in our clinical practice a diagnostic-therapeutic flowchart to select patients that can benefit the most from the treatment proposed. In addition, we reported in this study our experience of PMX-HA in a cohort of critically ill patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU). We analyzed a single centre, retrospective, observational web-based database (extracted from the EUPHAS2 registry) of critically ill patients admitted to the ICU between January 2016 and May 2021 who were affected by endotoxic shock. Patients were divided according to the diagnostic-therapeutic flowchart in two groups: Pre-Flowchart (Pre-F) and Post-Flowchart (Post-F). From January 2016 to May 2021, 61 patients were treated with PMX-HA out of 531 patients diagnosed with septic shock and of these, fifty patients (82%) developed AKI during their ICU stay. The most common source of infection was secondary peritonitis (36%), followed by community-acquired pneumonia (29%). Fifty-five (90%) out of 61 patients received a second PMX-HA treatment, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (78% of the Pre-F vs. 100% of the Post-F group, p = 0.005). In both groups, between T0 and T120, the Endotoxin Activity Assay (EAA) decreased, while the SOFA score, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and Vasoactive Inotropic Score (VIS) improved with no statistically significant difference. Furthermore, when performing a propensity score matching analysis to compare mortality between the two groups, statistically significant lower ICU and 90-day mortalities were observed in the Post-F group [p = 0.016]. Although in this experienced centre data registry, PMX-HA was associated with organ function recovery, hemodynamic improvement, and current EAA level reduction in critically ill patients with endotoxic shock. Following propensity score-matched analysis, ICU mortality and 90-day mortalities were lower in the diagnostic-therapeutic flowchart group when considering two temporal groups based on strict patient selection criteria and timing to achieve PMX. Further Randomised Control Trials focused on centre selection, adequate training and a flowchart of action when assessing extracorporeal blood purification use should be performed.

Indexed as

HemoperfusionShock, SepticCritical IllnessEndotoxinsHumansPolymyxin BRetrospective StudiesEndotoxinsPolymyxin B

Identifiers

PMID37845296
PMCPMC10579294
OpenAlexW4387665218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.