ArticleScientific reports2023
Few-shot learning for joint model in underwater acoustic target recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In underwater acoustic target recognition, there is a lack of massive high-quality labeled samples to train robust deep neural networks, and it is difficult to collect and annotate a large amount of base class data in advance unlike the image recognition field. Therefore, conventional few-shot learning methods are difficult to apply in underwater acoustic target recognition. In this report, following advanced self-supervised learning frameworks, a learning framework for underwater acoustic target recognition model with few samples is proposed. Meanwhile, a semi-supervised fine-tuning method is proposed to improve the fine-tuning performance by mining and labeling partial unlabeled samples based on the similarity of deep features. A set of small sample datasets with different amounts of labeled data are constructed, and the performance baselines of four underwater acoustic target recognition models are established based on these datasets. Compared with the baselines, using the proposed framework effectively improves the recognition effect of four models. Especially for the joint model, the recognition accuracy has increased by 2.04% to 12.14% compared with the baselines. The model performance on only 10 percent of the labeled data can exceed that on the full dataset, effectively reducing the dependence of model on the number of labeled samples. The problem of lack of labeled samples in underwater acoustic target recognition is alleviated.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.