Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37845257›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Computed tomographic imaging features to differentiate gastric schwannomas from gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a matched case-control study.

Lijia Wang, Qi Wang, Li Yang, Chongfei Ma, Gaofeng Shi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multiple Gastric Schwannoma: A Case Report.Current medical imaging · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lijia WangDepartment of Radiology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University and Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital, 12 Jiangkang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei Province, China.
Qi WangDepartment of Radiology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University and Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital, 12 Jiangkang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei Province, China. wq20@hotmail.com.
Li YangDepartment of Radiology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University and Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital, 12 Jiangkang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei Province, China.
Chongfei MaDepartment of Radiology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University and Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital, 12 Jiangkang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei Province, China.
Gaofeng ShiDepartment of Radiology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University and Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital, 12 Jiangkang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei Province, China.
Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University · CNHebei Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate clinical data and computed tomographic (CT) imaging features in differentiating gastric schwannomas (GSs) from gastric stromal tumours (GISTs) in matched patients, 31 patients with GSs were matched with 62 patients with GISTs (1:2) in sex, age, and tumour site. The clinical and imaging data were analysed. A significant (P < 0.05) difference was found in the tumour margin, enhancement pattern, growth pattern, and LD values between the 31 patients with GSs and 62 matched patients with GISTs. The GS lesions were mostly (93.5%) well defined while only 61.3% GIST lesions were well defined.The GS lesions were significantly (P = 0.036) smaller than the GIST lesions, with the LD ranging 1.5-7.4 (mean 3.67 cm) cm for the GSs and 1.0-15.30 (mean 5.09) cm for GIST lesions. The GS lesions were more significantly (P = 0.001) homogeneously enhanced (83.9% vs. 41.9%) than the GIST lesions. The GS lesions were mainly of the mixed growth pattern both within and outside the gastric wall (74.2% vs. 22.6%, P < 0.05) compared with that of GISTs. No metastasis or invasion of adjacent organs was present in any of the GS lesions, however, 1.6% of GISTs experienced metastasis and 3.2% of GISTs presented with invasion of adjacent organs. Heterogeneous enhancement and mixed growth pattern were two significant (P < 0.05) independent factors for distinguishing GS from GIST lesions. In conclusion: GS and GIST lesions may have significantly different features for differentiation in lesion margin, heterogeneous enhancement, mixed growth pattern, and longest lesion diameter, especially heterogeneous enhancement and mixed growth pattern.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsNeurilemmomaStomach NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID37845257
PMCPMC10579344
OpenAlexW4387692464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.