Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37845085›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2023

Patient enablement and health-related quality of life for patients with chronic back and knee pain: a cross-sectional study in primary care.

Amy Pui Pui Ng, John King Yiu Cheng, Joyce Sau Mei Lam, Carlos King Ho Wong, Will Ho Gi Cheng, Emily Tsui Yee Tse, David Vai Kiong Chao, Edmond Pui Hang Choi, Rosa Sze Man Wong, Cindy Lo Kuen Lam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amy Pui Pui NgDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China; Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3867-6447
John King Yiu ChengDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0009-0002-8704-776X
Joyce Sau Mei LamDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6856-6532
Carlos King Ho WongDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health (D4H) Hong Kong Science and Technology Park, Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6895-6071
Will Ho Gi ChengDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0388-3860
Emily Tsui Yee TseDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China; Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7409-9507
David Vai Kiong ChaoDepartment of Family Medicine & Primary Health Care, Kowloon East Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7120-5597
Edmond Pui Hang ChoiSchool of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9062-3540
Rosa Sze Man WongDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4745-1899
Cindy Lo Kuen LamDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China; Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7536-8481

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic back and knee pain impairs health- related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient enablement can improve HRQoL.

aimTo determine whether enablement was a moderator of the effect of chronic back and knee pain on HRQoL. DESIGN AND

settingA cross-sectional study of Chinese patients with chronic back and knee problems in public primary care clinics in Hong Kong.

methodEach participant completed the Chinese Patient Enablement Instrument-2 (PEI-2), the Chinese Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the Pain Rating Scale (PRS). Multivariable regression examined the effects of PRS score and PEI-2 score on WOMAC total score. A moderation regression model and simple slope analysis were used to evaluate whether the interaction between enablement (PEI-2) and pain (PRS) had a significant effect on HRQoL (WOMAC).

resultsValid patient-reported outcome data from 1306 participants were analysed. PRS score was associated with WOMAC total score (β = 0.326,

conclusionPatient enablement moderated the impact of pain on HRQoL. A higher level of enablement can lessen impairment in HRQoL associated with chronic back and knee pain.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeQuality of LifeCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPainPrimary Health Careback painchronic painhealth-related quality of lifekneemusculoskeletal painprimary care

Identifiers

PMID37845085
PMCPMC10587904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.