Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37845042›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2024

Environmental persistence, bioaccumulation, and hazards of chemicals in e-cigarette e-liquids: short-listing chemicals for risk assessments.

P Dilip Venugopal, Susana Addo Ntim, Reema Goel, Samantha M Reilly, William Brenner, Shannon K Hanna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

P Dilip Venugopal *Center for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Beltsville, Maryland, USA Dilip.Venugopal@fda.hhs.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-6339-5087
Susana Addo Ntim *Center for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Beltsville, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6432-0642
Reema GoelCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Beltsville, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4244-4315
Samantha M ReillyCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Beltsville, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6855-5748
William BrennerCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Beltsville, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-9682-8635
Shannon K HannaCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Beltsville, Maryland, USA.

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

methodsIncreased use and sales of e-cigarettes raises concerns about the potential environmental impacts throughout their life-cycle. However, few available research studies focus on the environmental impacts and ecotoxicity of e-cigarettes. In this study, we short-list e-liquid chemicals from published literature that should be considered in future environmental impact and risk assessments. We used a combination of available laboratory bioassays-based data and predictive methods (eg, Structure-Activity Relationships) to characterise the hazards of the e-liquid chemicals (environmental persistence, bioaccumulation, and aquatic toxicity including hazardous concentration values (concentration affecting specific proportion of species)) for short-listing.

resultsOf the 421 unique e-liquid chemicals compiled from literature, 35 are US Environmental Protection Agency's hazardous constituents, 42 are US Food and Drug Administration's harmful or potentially harmful constituents in tobacco products and smoke, and 20 are listed as both. Per hazard characteristics, we short-listed 81 chemicals that should be considered for future environmental impact and risk assessments, including tobacco-specific compounds (eg, nicotine, N'-nitrosonornicotine), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (eg, chrysene), flavours (eg, (-)caryophyllene oxide), metals (eg, lead), phthalates (eg, di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate) and flame retardants (eg, tris(4-methylphenyl)phosphate). IMPLICATIONS: Our findings documenting various hazardous chemicals in the e-liquids underscore the importance of awareness and education when handling or disposing of e-liquids/e-cigarettes and aim to inform strategies to prevent and reduce hazards from e-cigarettes. This includes any scenario where e-liquids can come into contact with people or the environment during e-liquid storage, manufacturing, use, and disposal practices. Overall, our study characterises the environmental hazards of e-liquid chemicals and provides regulators and researchers a readily available list for future ecological and health risk assessments.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsBioaccumulationHazardous SubstancesHumansRisk AssessmentUnited StatesHazardous SubstancesElectronic nicotine delivery devicesEnvironmentHeavy MetalsToxicology

Identifiers

PMID37845042
PMCPMC11018712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.