Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37845035›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

Different Faces of Medial Beta-Band Activity Reflect Distinct Visuomotor Feedback Signals.

Antoine Schwey, Demian Battaglia, Jyotika Bahuguna, Nicole Malfait

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Antoine SchweyInstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7289, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Aix-Marseille Université, 13005 Marseille, France nicole.malfait@univ-amu.fr antoine.schwey@univ-amu.fr.
Demian BattagliaInstitut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7289, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Aix-Marseille Université, 13005 Marseille, France.
Jyotika BahugunaInstitut d'Etudes Avancées de l'Université de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, 67084 Strasbourg, France.
Nicole MalfaitInstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7289, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Aix-Marseille Université, 13005 Marseille, France nicole.malfait@univ-amu.fr antoine.schwey@univ-amu.fr.
Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone · FRCarnegie Mellon University · USInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beta-band (13-35 Hz) modulations following reward, task outcome feedback, and error have been described in cognitive and/or motor adaptation tasks. Observations from different studies are, however, difficult to conciliate. Among the studies that used cognitive response selection tasks, several reported an increase in beta-band activity following reward, whereas others observed increased beta power after negative feedback. Moreover, in motor adaptation tasks, an attenuation of the postmovement beta rebound follows a movement execution error induced by visual or mechanical perturbations. Given that kinematic error typically leads to negative task-outcome feedback (e.g., target missed), one may wonder how contradictory modulations, beta power decrease with movement error versus beta power increase with negative feedback, may coexist. We designed a motor adaptation task in which female and male participants experience varied feedbacks-binary success/failure feedback, kinematic error, and sensory-prediction error-and demonstrate that beta-band modulations in opposite directions coexist at different spatial locations, time windows, and frequency ranges. First, high beta power in the medial frontal cortex showed opposite modulations well separated in time when compared in success and failure trials; that is, power was higher in success trials just after the binary success feedback, whereas it was lower in the postmovement period compared with failure trials. Second, although medial frontal high-beta activity was sensitive to task outcome, low-beta power in the medial parietal cortex was strongly attenuated following movement execution error but was not affected by either the outcome of the task or sensory-prediction error. These findings suggest that medial beta activity in different spatio-temporal-spectral configurations play a multifaceted role in encoding qualitatively distinct feedback signals.

Indexed as

CognitionPsychomotor PerformanceFeedbackFemaleHumansMaleMovementSensationbeta-band oscillationsEEGfeedback processingmotor learningreachingsensory-prediction error

Identifiers

PMID37845035
PMCPMC10711699
OpenAlexW4387665836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.