Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37844991›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Development of CORE-CM core outcome domain sets for trials of Chinese medicine for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Ya-Nan Sun, Yi An, Zhi-Wen Weng, Yan-Ji Zhou, Xi-You Wang, Chang-He Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ya-Nan Sun *Traditional Chinese Medicine Department, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yi An *First Clinical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhi-Wen Weng *Tuina and Pain Management Department, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yan-Ji Zhou *First Clinical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xi-You WangTuina and Pain Management Department, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, China yakno2@163.com dwxy658@163.com.
Chang-He YuTuina and Pain Management Department, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, China yakno2@163.com dwxy658@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2764-6229

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMost Asian countries have employed Chinese medicine (CM) and Western medicine to treat lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Evidence synthesis and comparison of effectiveness are difficult since outcomes examined and presented through trials possess heterogeneity. This study aimed to solve the outcome problems for CM clinical trials in LSS by building a core outcome set (COS).

methodsTo achieve an agreement on a set of core outcome domains, a four-phase study was carried out. First, we identified candidate outcome domains by systematically reviewing trials. In addition, we identified outcome domains associated with patients by conducting semistructured interviews with patients. Next, outcome domains were processed through a national two-round Delphi survey, in which 18 patients and 21 experts were recruited. Finally, the above domains were converted as a core outcome domain set based on a consensus meeting, in which 24 stakeholders were recruited.

resultsSeventeen outcome subdomains were identified by the systematic review and interviews. The Delphi survey assigned a priority to four outcome domains in the first round and four outcomes additionally in the second round. The core outcome domains were determined through discussion and redefinition of outcomes in the consensus meeting: pain and discomfort, health-related quality of life, lumbar function, activities of daily living, measures of walking, patient global assessment, adverse events and CM-specific outcomes.

conclusionCOS-CM-LSS is likely to enhance the consistency of outcomes reported in clinical trials. In-depth research should be conducted for the exploration of the best methods to examine the above outcomes.

Indexed as

Medicine, Chinese TraditionalSpinal StenosisActivities of Daily LivingDelphi TechniqueHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality of LifeResearch DesignTreatment OutcomeAgingCOMPLEMENTARY MEDICINEPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSpineSurveys and QuestionnairesSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID37844991
PMCPMC10582923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.