Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37844981›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Marianne Drabek, Duncan Hodkinson, Suzanne Horvath, Bonnie Millar, Stefan Pszczolkowski Parraguez, Christopher R Tench, Radu Tanasescu, Sudheer Lankappa, Richard Morriss, David Walsh and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marianne DrabekMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0009-0008-8976-9858
Duncan HodkinsonMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Suzanne HorvathNottingham NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Bonnie MillarNottingham NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Stefan Pszczolkowski ParraguezMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Christopher R TenchNottingham NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9067-0494
Radu TanasescuNottingham NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Sudheer LankappaAdult Mental Health, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Richard MorrissMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2910-4121
David WalshNottingham NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Dorothee P AuerMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK dorothee.auer@nottingham.ac.uk.
University of Nottingham · GBNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T024402/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic pain is a common health problem that is not efficiently managed by standard analgesic treatments. There is evidence that treatment resistance may result from maladaptive brain changes in areas that are fundamental to the perception of pain. Knee osteoarthritis is one of the most prevalent causes of chronic pain and commonly associated with negative affect. Chronic knee osteoarthritis pain is also associated with altered right anterior insula functional connectivity. We posit that reversal of these brain circuit alterations may be critical to alleviate chronic pain and associated negative affect, and that this can be achieved through non-invasive neuromodulation techniques. Despite growing interest in non-invasive neuromodulation for pain relief and proven efficacy in depression, results in chronic pain are mixed with limited high-quality evidence for clinical and mechanistic efficacy. Limitations include patient heterogeneity, imprecision of target selection, uncertain blinding and protocols that may deliver pulses at subclinical efficacy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We hence developed an optimised treatment protocol of connectivity-guided intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with accelerated delivery on four consecutive days (allowing 4 days within the same week as protocol variation) with five daily treatment sessions that will be piloted in a sham-controlled design in 45 participants with chronic knee pain. This pilot study protocol will assess feasibility, tolerability and explore mechanistic efficacy through serial functional/structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and quantitative sensory testing. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This pilot trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee Cornwall and Plymouth.Results of the pilot trial will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals, presented at research conferences and may be shared with participants and PPI/E advisors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15404076.

Indexed as

Chronic PainNeuralgiaOsteoarthritis, KneeBrainHumansPilot ProjectsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSecondary Health CareTranscranial Magnetic StimulationTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomChronic PainMagnetic Resonance ImagingPAIN MANAGEMENTRandomized Controlled TrialTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID37844981
PMCPMC10582853
OpenAlexW4387675903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.