Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37844671›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer2023

The interplay of obesity, microbiome dynamics, and innovative anti-obesity strategies in the context of endometrial cancer progression and therapeutic approaches.

Wesley C Burkett, Angela D Clontz, Temitope O Keku, Victoria Bae-Jump

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wesley C BurkettUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, United States of America. Electronic address: wesley.burkett@unchealth.unc.edu.
Angela D ClontzUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Nutrition Research Institute, United States of America. Electronic address: adclontz@email.unc.edu.
Temitope O KekuUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Medicine, Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, United States of America. Electronic address: temitope_keku@med.unc.edu.
Victoria Bae-JumpUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, United States of America; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America. Electronic address: victoria_baejump@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

UNC Integrated Translational Oncology Program (UNC-iTOP)T32CA244125 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WILLIAM Y. KIM, Jen Jen Yeh · 2019 to 2026
$3.9M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA244125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, and its incidence and mortality are rising. Obesity is more tightly associated with EC than any other cancer. Thus, the rising prevalence of obesity and associated risk factors, including diabetes and insulin resistance, cause alarm. The metabolic derangements of obesity increase the bioavailability of estrogen, hyperinsulinemia, and inflammation in a complex system with direct and indirect effects on the endometrium, resulting in proliferation and, ultimately, carcinogenesis. In addition, the gut dysbiosis associated with obesity helps contribute to these metabolic derangements, priming an individual for developing EC and perhaps affecting treatment efficacy. More recent studies are beginning to explore obesity's effect on the local tumor microbiome of EC and its role in carcinogenesis. Significant and sustained weight loss in individuals can considerably decrease the risk of EC, likely through reversal of the altered metabolism and dysbiosis resulting obesity. Bariatric surgery is the gold standard for successful weight loss and highlights how reversing of the systemic effects of obesity can reduce EC risk. However, the current limited availability, knowledge, and imposed stigma of bariatric surgery prohibits population-level reductions in EC. Therefore, effective and maintainable non-surgical dietary and pharmacologic interventions are needed.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsMicrobiotaCarcinogenesisDysbiosisEndometriumFemaleHumansObesityWeight LossBariatric surgeryCalorie restrictionDysbiosisEndometrial cancerIntermittent energy restrictionMicrobiomeObesity

Identifiers

PMID37844671
PMCPMC12046527
OpenAlexW4387643436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.