ArticleThe Science of the total environment2024
Inactivation efficacy and mechanisms of wavelength-specific UV sources for various strains of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1.
Article in The Science of the total environment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Infections of Legionnaires' disease in the United States caused by Legionella have increased ninefold between the years 2000-2018. Legionella harbored in biofilms or inside amoeba within premise plumbing can be more resistant to disinfectants, thus causing treatment challenges. Ultraviolet-light emitting diodes (UV-LEDs) are an emerging water disinfection technology with several advantages over conventional UV lamps. In this study, we evaluated the effects of UV-LEDs (255, 265, and 285 nm), a low-pressure (LP) mercury UV lamp (254 nm), and a bandpass filtered medium-pressure (MP) mercury UV lamp (220 nm) on properties and inactivation of three strains of L. pneumophila serogroup 1. The UV-LEDs emitting at 255 and 265 nm showed greater inactivation performance against all the strains compared to the UV-LED at 285 nm and the LP UV lamp at 254 nm. Our results showed that strains of the same serogroup exhibited different UV sensitivities. Analyses of DNA and protein damage revealed that UV exposure using 254, 255, and 265 nm predominantly causes DNA damage, while protein damage is predominant at 220 nm. Both DNA and protein damage were observed at 285 nm, but the extent of DNA damage was relatively less significant compared to the other wavelengths. Electric energy consumption analysis showed that water treatment using UV-LEDs is currently unsatisfactory compared to conventional LP UV lamps due to the mediocre wall plug efficiency (WPE) of UV-LEDs. However, recent studies indicate that the WPE of UV-LEDs is continuously improving. Overall, our study highlights that UV-LEDs are a promising technology for inactivating waterborne pathogens and have the potential to replace existing UV mercury lamps for water disinfection applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.