ArticleMedical image analysis2024
Improved myelin water fraction mapping with deep neural networks using synthetically generated 3D data.
Article in Medical image analysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Input Layer Regularization and Automated Regularization Hyperparameter Tuning for Myelin Water Estimation Using Deep Learning.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Diagnosing abdominal neoplasms using a T2 mapping radial turbo spin-echo technique with partial volume correction.European radiology · 2026Article
- Autoencoder-Based System for Detecting Anomalies in Pelletizer Melt Processes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We introduce a generative model for synthesis of large scale 3D datasets for quantitative parameter mapping of myelin water fraction (MWF). Our model combines a MR physics signal decay model with an accurate probabilistic multi-component parametric T2 model. We synthetically generate a wide variety of high quality signals and corresponding parameters from a wide range of naturally occurring prior parameter values. To capture spatial variation, the generative signal decay model is combined with a generative spatial model conditioned on generic tissue segmentations. Synthesized 3D datasets can be used to train any convolutional neural network (CNN) based architecture for MWF estimation. Our source code is available at: https://github.com/quin-med-harvard-edu/synthmap Reduction of acquisition time at the expense of lower SNR, as well as accuracy and repeatability of MWF estimation techniques, are key factors that affect the adoption of MWF mapping in clinical practice. We demonstrate that the synthetically trained CNN provides superior accuracy over the competing methods under the constraints of naturally occurring noise levels as well as on the synthetically generated images at low SNR levels. Normalized root mean squared error (nRMSE) is less than 7% on synthetic data, which is significantly lower than competing methods. Additionally, the proposed method yields a coefficient of variation (CoV) that is at least 4x better than the competing method on intra-session test-retest reference dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.